几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:42 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 all shear wall

tall shear wall
has anyone here ever had any experience designig very tall shear walls? i have walls on a private airplane hanger that we are designing that are 20' x '5'3" wide. the framing is 2" x 6" syp. we have structural sheathing on both sides. the chords have been the problem. i decided to use steel tubes as the chords. i have bearing plate on the top and bottom to spread the load out on the top and sill plates. on the outsite of either tube i have 3" framing to nail to. the anchors for the chords are being tied directly to the foundation.....any thoughts or anything your would specifically look at?
find a job or post a job opening
i would look at the wall's aspect ratio... the ubc limits the ratio to 2:1 for shearwalls, with some exceptions up to 3.5:1 (not sure about the ibc). your wall has a ratio of 3.8:1. it seems that calculated deflections would be unacceptable.
a couple of alternatives to think about:
1) moment frame(s)
2) ignore the slender panels and perform a rigid diaphragm analysis to transfer the loads to the other three sides of the building, assuming you have some solid panels to work with there.
actually the wall is 18' tall. so yes if they were 20' i would have been out of the 3.5 limit. the aspect ratios are the same for ibc 2:1 and 3.5 to 1 max with special provisions. the deflections were ok...mostly due to the steel tubes.
thanks
nkt,
i am sure you are right, but it sounds crazy to me.
a portal frame will be much more flexible than the 3.8 to 1 shear wall with steel tube chords.
this is the problem when you try to have codes that cover everything, you end up with inconsistencies.
cds72: i actually meant to present the option of a steel moment frame rather than a wood portal frame.
my concern is with inconsistencies between strength and rigidity: i assume the other sides of the building have mostly solid walls. if that is the case, much of the lateral load will distribute to the other more rigid walls before the slender shearwalls deflect enough (rigidity) to take the load they were designed for (strength). when the roof diaphragm is not designed for this action, you can end up with portions of the diaphragm being overloaded.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
sog shear reinforcing under wall huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 12:19 AM
in-plane tilt wall shear reinforcing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:20 PM
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:24 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多