几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:15 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 support for footing reinforcemen

support for footing reinforcement
at a recent visit to a job site, i was observing the reinforcement for a cmu cantilevered retaining wall with a concrete footing. the hooked dowels extending out of the footing were supported by tying an additional vertical rebar to each dowel, and embedding it in the earth.
this seems like a very poor practice in that it provides a path for water to enter the footing and corrode the reinforcement.
should i make the contractor remove the embedded rebar and support the dowels with chairs or small cmu blocks? anyone know of any articles addressing this concern?
thanks
ice
am i correct in saying that the footings haven't been poured yet? then you noticed the dowels as you mentioned? i am not sure how much of a path this will create for water to enter the footing given that the footing is no more likely to crack at service loads with this sort of rebar support. as a general cost consideration i have to think it is more expensive to be throwing rebar into the ground to support rebar, rather than using chairs or small block as you mentioned above.
we categorically reject any rebar supported this way that we find during our inspections. it is contrary to crsi placing reinforcing standards and is downright stupid.
you should reject it immediately and have the contractor do it right.
i would also say reject. he should be using rebar chairs or supporting the bars from above.
i saw bars shown this way on the design for a school i reviewed recently. i didn't like it but was left wondering if there is an official position by crsi which prohibits this practice.
technically it violates code.
in reality, unless the soil is very aggressively corrosive, by the time the entire length of rebar corrodes so that the rest of the steel can begin to corrode and cause a problem, the structure has probably lived its useful life anyway. i'd make them fix it since you saw it and it violates code and is another magnet you're wearing for liability.
thanks for the replies.
ucfse- where in the code is this prohibited?
contractors complained that chairs "sink" into base (compacted soils or aggregate), so i specified solid concrete bricks for bar supports. the dimensions (i think 2.5-inch thick and 3.5-inch wide) of concrete bricks do not provide 3-inch clear cover. inspector needs to check clearances prior to concrete placement.
good luck
this situation has occurred for me in the past. i made contractors remove such bar supports and replace with either chairs or precast concrete bricks. or, support the bars from above in some manner.
aci 318-05, 7.7.1
it violates minimum clear cover provisions.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
slab top reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:29 PM
question regarding floor support beam installation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:58 PM
can support be moved or removed huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:24 PM
【转帖】borland support dropped yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 04:58 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:46 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多