几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 11:32 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 structural plan standard

structural plan standard
just curious how other handle pojects with multiple levels and types of construction. some seem to cut sections thru the building while others group related work.
using sections cuts some show basement foundations on separate plans from neighboring upper level foundations while others show all foundations on one plan. using section cuts for framing plans some showing walls above the framing level in detail with walls below hidden while others show walls below the framing level only. for roofs, sections thru the building put lower level roof framing on the same plan as neighboring floor framing while others show all roof framing on one plan.
is there an official standard? aia?
i guess every job is different and some just don't fit in the usual box.
i try to do it as they build it, one level at a time.
architects like to show the walls above the floor structure below.
as this confuses me structurally, i like to show the floor/roof structure above and the supporting structure (walls and beams) below.
i also like reverse-polish logic.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
same as mike here. foundation plan shows structure above, all other levels show structure below.
i like reverse-polish too but does that mean most non-engineers prefer the polish logic?
the plans should, at all times, clarify the design of the structure from immediately below the floor to just above the floor. non-structural items can be shown in half tone just so you re
for me it depends on the size of the building and also if there is an architect and/or the architect's drawing quality. for a single-story wood framed building, i'll tend to show building sections in addition to a basement/first/roof plan. i can be more clear about how everything interacts, and considering the level of builder competence i usually deal with, more information is essential. you also get more dropped beams, headers in walls, etc with wood, which is more complicated to present clearly in plan format.
for a multi-story steel building, then it would be appropriate to present drawings with the typical floor by floor type approach.
we don't show building sections, but there are some projects where i can see the benefits of it.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
structural ii huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-16 11:25 AM
pe structural i or civil huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:54 AM
dimensions on structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:51 PM
datum reference style old new on y14.5m standard drawing huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:44 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:39 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多