几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:48 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 strip load surcharge on sheet pile wall with sloped backfill

strip load surcharge on sheet pile wall with sloped backfill
i am doing analysis on a sheet pile headwall for a cmp culvert under a railroad. i have been looking but have been able to figure out how to determine the lateral pressure from a strip load surcharge when the backfill has a 1:2 slope. i orginally just used the bousinesq formula, but because of the slope and distance from the centerline of track, it seems that this may be much too conservative.
i was looking at this thread
the bousinesq formula should work. because of superposition, it shouldn't matter if the backfill is flat or sloped. i would use the bousinesq formula. what is your condition that you think it is being too conservative? i recently verified some program outputs for this and thought that the lateral pressures were remarkably small.
the wall is about 23 feet from the centerline of the track, and by following the very last post in the before mentioned thread (
that response was provided by forum
i do, but i'm not sure where i would draw the line. i don't think it is necessarily outside the rankine zone. if you draw it out, it can be outside the rankine zone at grade, but be in the rankine zone at locations below grade. i would account for it to be safe. based on your dimensions it should have little impact.
poisson's ratio is more of a player than the actual surcharge magnitude itself.
1:2 slope is damn steep and probably unstable, maybe you mean 2:1? (horizontal distance: vertical distance)
yes, you are correct, it should be 2:1, thanks for pointing that out. although i do not understand why slopes are referred to in that way, its seems that intuitively it would be rise:run, but the standard practice is run:rise?
lunera:
v:h & h:v both in use. there is no problem to distinguish the correct from sketch (unless you left out the symbol and numerical values for slope), when writing, try 2h:1v, or 1v:2h for clarity. make sense?
lunera
sorry, i don't have the name of the publication. i xeroxed these sheets 25 years ago from a book i couldn't purchase. the book was brought here (us) from poland by an engineer that i worked with. didn't occur to me to write down the name of the book (duh). i've never seen solutions like these anywhere else. for more discussion, and the derivation to the formulas posted in the other thread, see
oops, got a call in the middle of the last post and forgot to attach the pdf. here it is.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
【转帖】哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 12:13 PM
哪位高手指点一下下边lisp的怎么用 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 06:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:21 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多