几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:37 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 stress distribution in concrete

stress distribution in concrete
i have a hp12x53 embedded in a concrete slab. hp12x53 has a horizontal load. how do i determine the stress distribution in concrete. can i assume a triangular distribution with the hinge at the top of the slab (ie zero stress at top)?. i know that the hinge forms at certain depth below the top surface, but is the assumption of triangular distribution of load still valid? if so, would the maximum occur at the bottom as it happens in soil?
if this is the problem of a cantilever embedment, a contrary pair of forces will develop in the concrete. other than going to very complex models, one merley would be seeking simplified pairs within the concrete by whichever the assumption of the assumed shape of the stresses, and then verify the stress is acceptable, designing reinforcement as the case requires, but one shouldn't acept as high compressive stresses as to need to reinforce for spalling, whatever the to be laid rebar is. not forgetting to check the steel
yes, this is analogous to a cantilever beam. how do i determine the embedment of the beam? i thought bearing stress in concrete along embedded length would be the good limiting factor. also, pull-out due to flexural stresses (tension in extreme fiber) has to be considered. is there a definite way to determine the embedment other than these two?
modern fem packages having compression only springs enable us to somewhat automatize the response. however it is unlikely such model represents reality. in my view, the easy and safe way is to use plastified stresses in the concrete at the opposed ends of the embedded member and first judge if low enough to not give problems. typically one shouldn't want the working service level stresses but at much about half the specified strength of the concrete.
then, any of the compressed parts may be near a face or edge; if such is the case proper anchor of the equilibrating force in the lever needs be accounted by a tie or convenient rebar against the induced action.
last, and for moderate concurrent tensile axial force, i would only count friction in proportion to the total amount of the resultant of both compression blocks at the end of the embedded lever.
for this case, only if axial tension is very big i would start to think in bond to the structural embedded part.
as a final comment, everything pertaining to high forces applied in small areas in concrete may be needed to be considered if our case approaches such extremes of application of force.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete sampling guidlines huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete mix= reinfocing for exterior composit deck huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:19 PM
concrete cracking stress vs. fatigue huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:58 AM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM
calculating reinforcing actual stress huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:03 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:53 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多