几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 10:27 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 strength of a shortened s-shape monorail

strength of a shortened s-shape monorail
odd situation/request but here it goes nonetheless;
currently have a s12x31.8 monorail (aprrox. 60' long / 5 cantilever supports) supporting a 5 ton chain hoist.
without getting into detail, i want to shorten the depth of the rail. i fully expect to analyze the condition but i'm trying to work out feasability right now.
i talked to our steel supplier and he said we could not get/buy a custom s-shape to what i wanted. he said they could make what i want out of plate. i don't necessarily want this as i want the s-shape maintained.
if analyzed for loading still within capability for my application;
1) could i cut a section out of the web and re-weld longitudinally and maintain the majority of my strength?
2) is this more work than adjusting to make use of custom plate beam (~w shape)?
frank "grimey" grimes
you can only trust statistics 90% of the time.
find a job or post a job opening
yes, but the strength is proportional to "d" squared. a 10" section cut and welded into a 8.25" section will have 32% less bending capacity and 44% less capacity due to deflection criteria (proportional to "d" cubed).
grimesfrank-
i believe it will cost less to cut the s shape down and re-weld it. for one, there is less welding involved, and rolled steel is less expensive than plate steel
civilperson-
i think the "d" squared and cubed relationships work for rectangular shapes, but not for s shapes. the strength reduction will be less.
beware of weld distortion. if it's an assembly-line process (as in making t-shapes out of beams), this can be accounted for in the process. but on a one-off fabrication, you can get some weld distortion that is not easily corrected.
thanks all.
i was hoping to get the cut/weld done offsite, but you're right the thing will warp by the time they get to the other side to weld. whats ideal on paper..........
time to get back to the drawing board.
frank "grimey" grimes
you can only trust statistics 90% of the time.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
low compressive strength for grou huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:48 AM
concrete compressive strength huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:53 AM
7 day concrete strength huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:56 AM
28 day vs. 56 day concrete breaks huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:34 AM
【转帖】shape Name For A Linetype Segemen yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 03:52 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:22 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多