几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-16, 12:10 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 so confused with slab design

so confused with slab design
hi, i am doing slab design. i have a #4@12" mat for bottom reinforcement and no mat for top. if i follow the safe output, i will have no rebar for some stress lines. qell, some senior engineers in my office said that i should provide rebar to cover every stress line for my slab. however, some senior engineers told me i didn't need to do that, just put rebar wherever needed and i also see some drawings which don't have rebar to cover every stress line in this office. i tried to find some info in the aci 05 code, but couldn't find anything related to that. i am so confused now.
you, and not your program, need to figure it out. if it is a simple span slab, you'd in theory only need reinforcing steel at the bottom. if it's a multi-span slab, you'd need reinforcing steel over the support as well. if you design a single span slab as "fixed" at the ends, you'd have reinforcing steel at the top at the ends. i'd recommend not doing that, because you then have to design the wall / beam that the slab sits on for the end moment that developes. for a single span slab with "pinned" ends, i still add some hook bars at the top of the slab to prevent cracking, as the reality is that it is a fixed connection.
ok, maybe i didn't explain my question clearly. now, i attached a pic. my question is that if the analysis shows that i don't need rebar to cover the stress line between column 2 and 4, do i need to provide minimum reinforcement at that location? i mean for the mid strip, i already have rebar for the column strip.
yes. aci is pretty clear that, at a minimum, you must provide enough reinforcement for temperature and shrinkage.
structuraleit: yes, aci requires to provide enough reinforcement for temperature and shrinkage. here, since i already have a mat for the bottom reinforcement. do i still need provide enough top reinforcement for temperature and shrinkage?
oh, i didn't quite follow. so you have #4@12" on the bottom everywhere and a top mat only where needed?
that is fine. as long as the #4@12" satisfies t & s then you are fine. adding the top rebar where it isn't needed will only cause congestion when it isn't needed.
cityboy,
you are discovering something about engineering that they dont teach you at uni - engineers have differing opinions on a lot of things.
much of your confusion is due to the fact that you have asked a number of people and got conflicting opinions. best to ask only one or two people, and get them to explain their opinion, ask lots of intelligent questions and then back it up with some research of your own.
you need to detail the slab in accordance with you analysis - if you have relied on a negative moment over the supports, then you have to reinforce it for this.
sorry on by phone so couldn't see your sketch clearly. if theres no need for rebar in top would still provide some mesh just to help with cracking (depending how deep it is) ni one will thank you if cracks develop
go review section 10.5 of aci 318. it expressly states that "at every section of a flexural member where tensile reinforcement is required by analysis..." and then goes on to state what the minimum required as is.
section 10.5.4 is for slabs and footings and refers you back to 7.12, which is temp and shrinkage reinforcing.
if your analysis shows that you have tensile stress in concrete, and you are not designing that concrete as plain concrete per chapter 22, then you have a
structuraleit: yes, i have #4@12" mat on the bottom everywhere . so i need to provide reinforcement for the top slab since there is not mat everywhere.
csd72: the reason i asked a number of people because when i work for different projects, the project/senior engineers have different requirement. you know i have to follow their instructions. same office, different standard, that's why i am confused.
herewegothen: additional rebar will help to prevent cracking. but the design will not be economic if we put too much rebar where not needed.
jae: the section 10.5 states the minimum reinforcement for temperature and shrinkage. i agree we need that reinforcement. my question is that if i already have a #4@12" mat everywhere at the bottom of slab, do i still need to provide minimum reinforcement for temperature and shrinkage at the top of slab if analysis shows i don't need reinforcement for tension there?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
slab-on-grade w embedded rails huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:30 PM
slab on grade problem huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:24 PM
reinforced tank design- the slab huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 05:21 PM
pt slab design - something called drop bands or slab bands huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 03:17 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 08:21 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多