几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:53 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 single angle compression

single angle compression
i am working on an existing structure with some single angle columns, built in 1955, and am working to make it meet the 2003 ibc code requirements. i am aware of the method used in the 1989 asd specification and the article from 1991 aisc engineering journal showing how to calculate the compressive capacity of angles that are loaded at the legs. using this method it shows the angles are seriously overstressed, although they have been in use for 50 years with no problems. a coworker commented and said the aisc asd method for calculating capacity is a very conservative method. he mentioned that asce has a design guide for transmission towers that lists asd capacity tables or a less conservative method for single angles in compression. has anyone used this and does anyone know which publication this is?
thanks.
whats your axial load, lenght and type of angles?
the new 13th edition has some updated information on single angle designs which may help some. the biggest difference being that it allows you to calculate the combined stresses based on the loads at a point. in the 9th edition you used the maximum moment, with the max axial load to check the section which more often these loads are not applied at the same point. the 13th edition aisc manual will also give you greater bending capacity in general. i would not be suprised to see the angles somewhat overstressed if they were sized in 1955. a lot has changed with column buckling since then.
thanks i will check out the new manual and see. these are continuous columns with floor beams and bracing every 12', columns are 160' high. l6x6x7/16. i would never think they would calc by looking at it.
- one thing i just realized is that i applied the entire axial load at an eccentricity, and i should have only applied the incremental load at an eccentricity and the rest of the load should be concentric. that will change things quite a bit....
l6x6x7/16, concentrically loaded, with a kl of 12 feet, shows an allowable service load of 49.9 kips in the 13th edition of the aisc manual. eccentric loading shows an allowable load of 25.7 kips.
assuming there are 13 floors supported by this angle (160 feet @ 12 feet per floor), there is a dl of 50 psf and a ll of 70 psf (office), and the tributary area is 10 feet by 20 feet (edge column in small bay spacing?), the loading is around 310 kips.
am i missing something here?
is this really a building column???
yes, this is not a typical building but an open structure, a stair tower.
well re-running the #'s it almost works according to the 13th ed aisc manual, but not according to the 9th ed. and the 13th edition is not accepted in the 2003 ibc.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
masonry lateral ties in compression huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 12:42 PM
how do i figure the angle of a ridge cap along a hip ridge huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:18 PM
angle brace in compression huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:09 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:45 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多