几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:53 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 single double angles for steel bracing

single & double angles for steel bracing
both single and double angles are used for bracings in steel structures. back-to-back double angles are more popular since the saving of connection bolt (due to double shear) and no worry about the entire buckling around weakest axis z (in an angle to x or y). can anybody advise your rule of thumb and experience in using single angle bracing?
thanks in advance.
check out our whitepaper library.
well i use this rule of thumb
you try single angle until angle size 80x80x8
if it exceed more than this you should better use 2 angles back to back for economy
note:- 80x80x8 are dimensions for european sections and
are 80mms height of both legs and 8mms thickness of
both. (i do not know it equavliant in american
sections)
another solution is to use two angles forming star shape
my rule of thumb for the selection of a trial section is to have (a) the slenderness ratio (l/r) less than 180 and (b) sag due to self weight less than l/150.
are these anles in exterior environment or interior? exterior angles, back to back or even star shape have problems with corrosion between the legs - tough to clean and repaint. a single angle or a wt section is better.
my thumb rule is to use double angles where some compression or bending is likely (star shape is my favorite too). in tension only
i agree with pmkpe re preference for single angles ot tees (or even hollow structural sections) for agressive environments.
aren't star shapes and tees very poor torsionally? ok for tension only
thanks for the input.
i have never used star shape, it is just for painting convenience, i guess. but it traps dirt as well, and needs more connection bolts. in addition, the interconnection is not as easy/good as back-to-back angles. the local buckling of single piece between interconnectors may be larger concern.
whether use angle, wt, hss, or wf can be another big topic. it is determined in many cases by client's or fabricator's preferences without structural reason.
regards,
i believe two angles in starred configuration [preferably equal angles] are excellent in compression, you get quite a large radius of gyration and that will reduce slenderness ratio followed by larger capacity. i have used this section successfully in a few situations and did not receive any negative feed back so far.
regards
am
i always try to ensure that the bracing system is such that none of the bracing members are in compression. an example of this would be the traditional end bay bracing detail. this way you can use the more efficient tensile capacity of the steel. a single angle in this respect is ideal due to ease of connection.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
permanent truss bracing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:11 PM
【转帖】模拟南方软件下polyline线的输入(并进行修改),不敢独享 - 精华帖集合 yang686526 ObjectARX(VB.NET/C#) 0 2009-04-29 05:37 PM
【转帖】在vba里由基本三角函数导出的三角函数 yang686526 数据库ObjectDBX 0 2009-04-28 12:25 PM
在vba里由基本三角函数导出的三角函数 yang686526 ObjectARX(AutoLISP) 0 2009-04-26 06:33 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:16 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多