几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 08:26 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 sectional area sizing with fu per asd

sectional area sizing with fu per asd
anyone know how tension member sectional areas came to be sized with the ultimate strength, fu, with a factor of safety = 2, while the middle of the member's area is sized with fy with a fs = 1.5?
area net req'd at connections = tensile load / (fu/2)
area gross req'd btwn. conn's = tensile load / (fy/1.5)
my guess is that the rupture stress, fu, the stress at which the connection bolts will tear thru the member ends, was just divided by 2 to get the allowable stress. but why is the middle section based on yield stress and not ultimate as well? (or vice-versa.) for a36, fu/2 = 29ksi; fy/1.5 = 24 ksi, so the connection should yield first since it is designed closer to fy. is there an advantage to that? any corrections and pointers would be greatly appreciated.
find a job or post a job opening
you are checking two different limit states - rupture and yielding. the tension rupture limit state checks the ultimate tensile strength of the material (fu) at the net section while the tension yielding limit state checks the yield strength of the gross section at yield (fy). the same type checks apply in lrfd as they do with asd. the difference in safety factors is due to the fact that rupture is a brittle and in general more difficult to predict and erratic limit state as opposed to yielding thus the higher safety factor (and in lrfd the lower phi factor).
the reason for the two different limit states is that typically the gross strength of a member would well exceed fyag due to strain hardening - however the large elongations induced by the yielding through the entire section would probably render the member ineffective for its intended purpose thus "failing" it (though not actually falling down). the actual member tearing mode of rupture will occur along the plane of least resistance (at the bolt holes) and requires the member to actually break thus the use of the ultimate tension stress fu.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
for aisc, which method, lrfd, or asd, should one use huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:11 PM
explain asd vs lrfd to a dumb me huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:14 AM
asd vs. lrfd huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:34 PM
aisc 341-02 seismic provisions with asd design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:31 AM
13th edition steel manual huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:33 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:39 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多