几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 07:18 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 roof dead load calculation

roof dead load calculation
when figuring total vertical loads for gravity or seismic loads, does anyone adjust the roof dead loads for the slope of the roof?
i just looked at a 12:12 pitched roof, and if you compensate for the pitch, the flat projected dead load is increased by about 25%. i've never done this before, but i will now as it seems reasonable to me. obviously, for lower pitched roofs, the results will not be as dramatic, and at some point, neglected. however, i feel that the results here are worth considering. the effect is to increase the normal 12 to 15 psf dead load to more in the range of 15 to 19 psf.
this seems so basic, but i have never heard of it before. i know. i'm dangerous.

mike mccann
mmc engineering
check out our whitepaper library.
yes, i do consider this on a steep slope as you mention.
but like you i am lazy and ignore it on "low" slope roofs such as 4:12 and less.
but i typically round every dead load up, which compensates for this somewhat. for example, i assume a gwb ceiling, which really weighs 2.5 psf, to weigh 3 psf.
daveatkins
mike,
i hadn't thought about it much either. in special cases like your high slope, yeah it makes a little difference.
in most of my analyses, dead load is a non-conservative consideration (high uplift) so less is more for me.
ron
i'm not really worried about it, as for most major beams in the roof, i have always use one size greater than what is required by calculations. and, i too, round up the dead load for vertical and seismic, but deflate it for uplift.
thanks for verifying that i am not crazy.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
i do this as well - my first job doing structural design, i asked a more senior engineer about it and he replied that he'd never thought about it.
i assume you are implying that you will account for the "true" area of the roof rather than the projected "plan view" area. i have always accounted for it and didn't know that people neglected it. of course, it would be small for low slopes.
interesting to read the different processes.
i included it in my beam design spreadsheet however my boss doesn't account for it... but he uses 0.5kpa for a sheeted timber roof with ceiling - 25% more than the 0.4kpa i use.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
partition live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 11:35 AM
load combination questionpoll huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:01 AM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM
dead load distribution to frames huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:30 PM
ad load factor in asd huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:46 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多