几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 04:54 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 rectangular hss truss

rectangular hss truss
i'm designing a rectangular hss truss with welded connections. i put together a risa model to analyze the overall design of the truss. i am now to the point where i am checking localized failure at each connection point. i am using chapter k of the 13th edition of the steel manual. in chapter k2.3a there are limits of applicability for the hss-to_hss connections section, and number (2) states that the truss branch angle needs to be greater than 30 degrees. however, the branch angle i have is a little over 20 degrees. in order to make it 30 degrees, i would have to add quite a few more branches to the truss, and it would increase the cost significantly. does anyone know of the provisions for the condition i have? any suggestions on what i should do?
contanct the aisc solution center for direction.
add 90 degree posts at panel points.
if you do ask the steel solution center at aisc, be sure to post back with their response. i have found them to be totally useless when it comes to questions like this that are out of the box.
here's the response i bet you'd receive: "the equations in the specification are based on testing which was performed within the limits shown, in this case the 30 degree minimum angle. for your case, the equations are not applicable. good luck figuring out a solution."
add another diagonal 90 degrees to the main axis of the one the one with the shallow angle, or whatever angle would get you within the 30 degree limit. let risa do the rest.
think out of the box.
mike mccann
mccann engineering
i already have 90 degree posts at panel points.
msquared48 - i'm not undertanding your suggestion. how would adding a perpendicular
i wqas assumint the angle of intersection of the web member to the bottom chord was 20 degrees. cutting the web
gee...that really printed well...
i won't try that again!
mike mccann
mccann engineering
with the 90 degree posts, the angle of the web members can be modeled as 70 degrees to the posts. build the connections of the webs to the side of the vertical posts, (at the extreme top and bottom), rather than directly to the chords.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
permanent truss bracing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-15 12:11 PM
massive hss truss design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:05 PM
lateral wind loads - residential construction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 09:57 AM
hss vierendeel truss conxns huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:10 PM
expansion in hss truss huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:05 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:29 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多