几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 03:42 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 quality controlassurance in design calcs

quality control/assurance in design calcs
hi all, i have a question i thought i would throw out there. as a young structural engineer i spend a fair amount of my time running design calculations by hand. in my 3 years of work so far i've found several methods for reducing errors or ommisions in my calculations. i've got several methods of my own, such as simply double-checking my own work, using calcs from a similar project as a template, reading through the pertinent codes before starting on the calculations, and asking a mentor/senior engineer for advice or guidance.
what methods do you use to ensure quality in your design calcs? have any of you found any methods to be particularly useful? what have you found that works or doesnt work?
thanks
i believe the best qa is to have someone else, who is knowledegable of the subject, check your work. i realize that this is not always possible, but i believe that it's the "best" method.
also, and this is very important, make sure to verify any assumptions you make in the design process. i venture to say that this is just as important as having calculations checked.
tinytim22...you mention your "3 years of work so far", indicating you are not yet licensed. i would certainly hope that your firm has a policy that the engineer of record reviews all calculations for a project.
as steve1 stated, it is better to have a second set of eyes on your work.
ask yourself if your result makes sense. young engineers don't really have the years of practical experience under their belt to tell them that their design doesn't make sense.
you know what they say if you assume, right?? they say you are an engineer. if you have a simple span beam with uniform load across 75% of it, run the numbers for that case. than assume a simple case of the uniform load running the entire length of the beam.
lastly, check your result with a computer, although that is usually how we get the original result.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in-house design reviews quality assurance huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:20 PM
in a design and built contract,i ha huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:16 PM
dots requiring pe stamps on shop drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:18 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
calculations personal tool or public record huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:10 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:02 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多