几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-15, 10:29 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 omega and ocbfs

omega and ocbf's
i overheard a conversation reguarding the use of omega in ocbf vs scbf and hoped someone could confirm/deny/shed greater light on the subject.
for a scbf the brace is designed for r=6. with omega=2 applied to the connections making the connection design twice as strong as the brace. so a reliability of r=3 appears be the max force necessary to design for.
but an ocbf has a r=3.25* and an omega=2. applying omega here ostensively enhances the design of the connection to be equivalent to r=1.625 or 2x stronger than the connection of the scbf!
the conversation i overheard was just that - it is not appropriate to apply omega to an ordinary systems because the reliability is already reduced to minimum levels by the lower r values.
thanks
al
*p.s. (was an r=3.25>3 selected just so the design would be forced to comply with the special seismic provisions?)

regarding the ps - the r of 3.25 was chosen to discourage users from using ocbfs in seismic regions (as well as to keep it in the realm of the seismic provisions).
lana02, the comment you heard that you don't use ω values on ocbf is wrong in my view. the fact that the numbers don't come out to be the same between scbf and ocbf is what willisv describes - trying to keep you towards the special frames/braces in high seismic and also a reflection of the higher detailing requirements that ensure better ductility.

see the latest seismic provisions aisc 341 for when to use the overstrebgth factor for braced frames.
i don't have my copy here, but from memory the expected yield force is used for smf, imf & omf connection design
per aisc 341 for connection design, for scbf the expected yield force is used and the overstrength factor is used for ocbf. they both use an increased load for the connection design.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:53 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多