几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 04:42 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 not-to-scale drawings question

not-to-scale drawings question
i am the eor on a project where the drawings i issued were plotted to 1/8" = 1'-0". the architect and other consultant's drawings were plotted at the appropriate scales. when the architect printed the stick set of drawings for the contractor and everyone's reference sets, all of the drawings were printed at a scale slightly less than 1/8" per foot. in fact, the horizontal scale is slightly off but the vertical scale is way off. the architect is panicked that cd's were issued and not to scale. he is considering re-issuing the stick sets. what are the ramifications if he does nothing? i've never encountered or heard of this before.
check out our whitepaper library.
i would expect field problems. even if your drawings say that dimensions control over scaling, they will still scale the details and come up with problems.
fix it ---
way too many drawings are released today with little or no dimensions - i guess we are supposed to rely on the scale.
while this may not affect you - here is what i get---
a pdf drawing that has been scanned and then faxed or copied or both. all change the scale!!!!!
at 1/8 scale - something that was 10' orginally scales out to 9' for me... big problems!!
good luck
you're getting spot-on advice. i would take it.
just my 2c.
cheers,
ys
b.eng (carleton)
working in new zealand, thinking of my snow covered home...
when we issue drawings, we don't even put a scale legend on them to try and avoid this.
while someone could figure out the scale by measuring a dimension, we say not to scale the drawings in our specs.
i agree with reissuing them and telling the architect to scan them to scale.
btw and as a followup - i have gotten more than one set of drawings where the architect forget to change the scale that was probably on his template.
for example - 1/4'' and 3/16'' aren't that far apart and it really screwed things up since we were just doing a plan take off.
although my company prefers to indicate the scale (i have suggested to them that we do not), i agree with tngolfer. when i review documents i look at the dimensions and do not scale. all dimensions required to build the structure should be indicated somewhere. if it was mistakenly omitted, i would rather have a contractor submit an rfi as opposed to scale it off a dwg. i do think dwgs should be drawn to scale, but sometimes they are not and sometimes when revisions are needed it is much quicker and not uncommon to change a dimension rather than redraw it.
in school i was taught never to write the scale(i.e 1/8"=1'-0")and always use a graphic scale. this would remedy the scaling problems associated with scans,faxes,copies and half size prints. however, in my professional experiences i cannot recall having seen graphic scales used.
my thoughts for what they are worth.
i thought the abreviation "nts" means "not too sure" or is it "not to scale"?
we never had this problem in the non-computer age! just goes to prove that you can make more mistakes much faster with the computer.
this problem has long predated computers. as mrpid pointed out it could often be caused by a dimension changing without redrawing the view. this was more common before computers when it was far more difficult to redo a hand drawn, and especially inked, view. photocopiers weren't usually accurate enough to maintain a scale.
i even saw a summer student years ago scale from a half-scale drawing (11"x17") without realizing it was reduced.
graphic scales are a good idea though we rarely used them.
not sure if you were kidding but nts means "not to scale".

some of the architects that i work with use the graphic scale but not all. i rarely use one, but might reconsider after what just happened. i have a note in my general notes stating the drawings are not to be scaled and that the contractor accepts responsibility for using scaled dimensions. i suspect the problem was photocopied drawings that were somehow "fit" to the sheet size, but i'm not certain that is the problem. thanks for the comments.
another comment regarding half size plots: i do not know if it is specific to our printer/copier (your standard office 11x17 printer/copier) but if a full size document is 22x34 then you would expect a 11x17 to be exactly 1/2 size; however, our printer cannot print to the whole sheet therefore it comes out slightly less than half scale or if you print to scale it will trim some of the border/title block. there are ways to remedy this by varying/changing your border size but the scale discrepancy was commonly overlooked by people not aware of this problem.
just something to consider.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
how to handle see structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:48 PM
dimensions on structural drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:51 PM
certification of shop drawings huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:16 PM
drawing scale huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 10:32 AM
【转帖】drawing scale yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:47 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:21 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多