几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 03:31 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 mwfrs question

mwfrs question
this is probably going to sound silly, but i have to ask.
i was taught in school (and have seen others do it this way) that for mwfrs pressures, you neglect the internal component because they will counteract each other (the windward wall internal pressure counteracting the leeward wall internal pressure).
that assumes that the internal pressure is either causing pressure or suction on both walls at the same time. isn't it possible for the interior pressure to be causing pressure on one and suction on the other? that seems to me to be the worst case.
additionally, if asce 7 intended to have the internal pressures ignored for mwfrs then why is it included in the calc?
so the first question is this:
do you consider what is shown as case 1 or case 2 in the attached sketch when calc'ing mwfrs pressures?
the second question is this:
the minimum pressure for mwfrs is given in 6.1.4.1 as "the wind load to be used in the design of the mwfrs for an enclosed or partially enclosed buliding or other structure shall not be less than 10 psf multiplied by the area of the building of structure projected onto a vertical plane normal to the assumed wind direction....."
i take this to mean that for an enclosed (or partially enclosed) structure that the minimum wind pressure (for both windward and leeward combined) is 10 psf, not 10 psf minimum for windward and 10 psf minimum for leeward.
an open structure is another story, but my question is for enclosed structures.
eit, you either have positive or negative pressure inside a building. lets say there is no window on the windward wall, and there is a window on the leeward wall. this will create suction. it will create positive pressure if you flip the walls. just like pressure in a tank, you cant have positive pressure and negative pressure in the same tank.
never, but never question engineer's judgement
that's what i thought, but why is it in the equation?
my understanding is that in the real world, in one enclosed space, internal air pressure will either in outward pressure or in suction. no such thing as one wall outward, another wall suction, which is against natural law.
if there is two room, it is possible that one room in outward pressure, another room in suction, but it will be in two enclosed spaces.
for second question, my understanding is 10psf is the total (includes both windward and leeward).
if i am wrong, please correct me.
internal wind pressures cancel out for wall pressures but not for roof pressures.
i definitely agree with that, but does anyone know why it is in the equation?
probably for partially enclosed system. and it is 10 psf combined.
never, but never question engineer's judgement
structuraleit-
agree with the previous posts. for buildings shaped like the one in your sketch, the pressures will cancel. for gabled roof buildings, where one wall is taller than the other, they may not.
one - re
but doug, if you look at single wall, then you should probably look at components and cladding. i think eit knows the concept. he was just wondering why we have equation for internal pressure or suction since we dont use it. i think it is for partially open building mwfrs.
never, but never question engineer's judgement
i am evaluating some new software to determine if we are going to buy it or not and some of the things it is doing with wind pressures was really throwing me for a loop and i had to question everything i thought i knew about wind!
thank you gentleman, it's been a pleasure....... as always!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
mwfrs or cc huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:31 PM
mwfrs or c=c huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 03:30 PM
consider it as mwfrs or cc huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:21 PM
profile and datum question huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:20 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:40 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多