几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 01:49 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 metric - kg or n

metric - kg or n
accepted si application convention is newtons and pascals, with their appropriate prefixes. this is what i am teaching in construction/engineering coursework and in my consulting activities.
i agree that fundamentally it makes no difference as long as consistency prevails.
in the uk we use newtons and either pascals or newtons per square millimetre. the deign codes in the uk and across europe use these units, although, as ron states, whichever you use, consistency is the key.
regards
andy machon
kg is the unit for mass, n is the unit for force, see newton's law.
using kgf for force is outdated and considering the messages above confusing.
i believe sometimes they use kilogram as a force by assuming earth's gravity, i.e. 1 kgf = 9.81 n. this is analogous to using pounds for mass rather than slugs.
in fact unity sistems before si did not pay much atention to the efect of gravity.
i think that in venezuela they still use the so called technical system of unities like in the old germany, designated as mkps ( meter, kilograme weigth and second ).
nowadays the countries all around the world subscribed a convention to addopt and use forever the si unities, i am sure even the usa had subscribed that, but as it is a strong market is still keeping in use the imperial system of unities.
cv
i agree with ron that consistency is all that matters. since the rest of the world uses newtons and its appropriate derivatives (kn, kpa, mpa etc.), the si system is the one to use.
when you make the change as i did twice - firstly from the old european system of kg as a force to the old british system of lbs and inches and feet; secondly to the si system when it was introduced in australia - you will experience a brief period of discomfort.
before long, you will forget the old system and relish the new one with its clear distinction between mass and force.
it is of no any problem to use this or this units as we are understandig the meaning of them and the diversion formula n , kn , pascal are used in countries which are using foot inch base in calculation but in countries which are using meter and cms. they are using the matching force units kg., ton. which is equal to 1000 kgms. nevertheless there is a relation amog all these units like 1000 kn=100 ton (metric ton ) approximately and can be calculated exacly by knowing the gravity acceleration value in the two units.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
mixed metric designs huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 11:44 AM
metric title block tolerances huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 11:42 AM
【转帖】asmeb107.100-2002-b94.9-1999标准 huangyhg American standards 1 2009-09-01 09:28 AM
【转帖】metric title block tolerances yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:50 PM
【转帖】metric dimensioning convention yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:49 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:15 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多