几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 01:09 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 mat foundation reinforcing

mat foundation reinforcing
i'm designing a mat foundation to support material handling equipment. the equipment is basically a short (in height) series of beams and supports that transfers long bundles of material across it. when i normally design a mat foundation, it's for a silo or tower and ends up being rather thick, and reinforced with a top and bottom mat of steel. this mat fdn for the mat'l handling equipment does not need to be more than 8" thick with shrinkage and temperature steel as the min. reinforcing required.
my intent is to place the steel at mid height of the slab. typically, i use a top and bottom mat of reinforcing designed for the positive and negative moments between supports. but in this case, i feel that is overkill.
anyone designed something similar that they could share their experiences on?
if you providing shrinkage reinforcement, you may place it close to top (where shrinkage will occur). i would place it 1.5-2.0 inches from the top.
good luck.
sometimes "overkill" is not bad. for slabs that may have unpredictable loading, the top and bottom rebar mats that you typically use are well suited. i prefer a minimum 12 inch thick concrete slab with #4 @ 12 inches, on center, each way, top & bottom as a minimum design for an industrial material handling mat.
consider the economics of a 12 inch slab vs and 8 inch slab:
1. excavation cost may a little higher, but not much.
2. subgrade preparation costs are identical.
3. there is "room" for meaningful top and bottom rebar mats. in the 8 inch slab the rebar is at, or near, the neutral axis and is of limited value.
4. the formwork is virtually identical.
5. concrete placement cost may be a little higher, but not much.
6. concrete finishing costs are identical.
7. concete curing costs (curing compound, etc.) and time required are identical.
8. you do buy 50% more concrete, but you are getting it installed for essentially the cost of the concrete.
to me, the extra 4 inches is cheap insurance.
also the steel will actually work in the slab. of course the owner will never overload the slab by bringing in a load of steel beams and drop one or more.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
mat foundation of non-unform thickness huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:08 PM
mat foundation design by hand huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 01:07 PM
foundation mat with a cracked section huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:34 PM
foundation cracking and settling huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:24 PM
connecting a new foundation to an existing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:09 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:02 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多