几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 12:44 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 masonry rebar lap length - any news

masonry rebar lap length - any news?
hi all
just wondering if there have been any new developments regarding the lap splice length of rebar in masonry? to this day, every job i have contractors telling me i am nuts with the lap lengths i specify, which are calculated by that crazy aci 530 equation.
thanks
andrew
check out our whitepaper library.
you should stick to what you are willing to stand behind. i'm not that well versed in the masonry code, but it could very well be that all the recent code revisions have crept into it as well. we've all had to adapt to extensive revisions over the last decade. maybe you are just dealing with people who want to do it the way they learned back in the old days. unless you find something better, i suggest telling them you are only designing by the current code.
you are legally responsible to follow the adopted code. that makes the decision easy, as far as what to do, though it may not be what we like or want.
i agree you are responsible to follow the code. however, it is possible that new research or newly released codes/standards may contain different requirements, which are not yet adopted by the current code. it is also possible in these cases to obtain exceptions to the current code by the building official based on this new information.
i was simply asking if anyone knew of any knew codes which have different requirements than the older codes, like say the 2004 fbc or 2000 ibc. for instance, if the masonry society had recently released a position paper stating that they recommend x number of bar diameter lap, that may be good enough for the building official. contrary to popular believe, the codes are not carved in stone. there are always possibilities to modify the code, if you can show that it is appropriate to do so.
check aci-530-05 equation 2-9, development of bars in tension and compression. the previous code requirement for lap splices was different and may be causing the confusion.
aci 530-05 results in approximately 20% to 25% shorter laps than aci 530-02 & ibc 2003. this ends up being shorter than 48 bar diameters for #5 and smaller bars, but longer than 48 bar diameters for larger bars.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
masonry lap splices huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 12:41 PM
masonry cemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 12:28 PM
ibc 2107.2.3 vs. aci 530 2.1.8.6.1.1 masonry lap length cage huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 06:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 12:47 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多