几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 11:28 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 locomotive shed

locomotive shed
has anyone ever designed a shed (pre eng rigid frame)for a 300,000 lb locomotive. for overnite storage and minor repairs. two sets of tracks for two machines. one set straddles a 30 ft concrete pit for access to the underside
no turntable?
mike mccann
mmc engineering
no turntable this is a small local siding . shed is for overnite storage only
why would the design of this shed differ from any other just because it is over a rail line?
i got the impression the pit is part of the project - particularly copnsidering taking the lateral kick of any mainframes and the resulting hole in the slab.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
i wonder if you might get more specialized help in the railroad engineering forum.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
mike,
the hole wouldn't affect how i would design the shed, because i would never depend on the slab, and rarely depend on tension ties.
he was talking about a rigid frame hokie which generates a horizontal thrust needing hairpins or tension ties or specially designed footings. as i see it, depending how close the hole is to the edge of the building, this could be affected... ??????????????
mike mccann
mmc engineering
yes, i know that. of your three methods, i always use "specially designed footings". a two pile group or a mass concrete footing. hairpins, ugghh!
rittz-
what are your concerns regarding design? i look at this as a building with a pit. not an uncommon thing. the pit walls and foundation will be large to accomodate the locomotive, but the building will not be excessively wide or tall so the base reactions will be reasonable.
post your concerns and i'm sure you'll get more focused help.
to answer cwt... the rails are to be supported on a on concrete pad (7 ft +/- wide and 16" +/- thick x 200 ft long) which in turn is supported on 3 ft +/- engineered fill (which will replace the exsiting highly pastic clay). the pit is about 24 fit long somewhere along the long pad describe described above. the rails are supportd on the pit walls (12" or so thick) which are supported by a raft slab (24 ft x 7 ft+/-wide) 7 ft below. obviously the locomotive produces a moving (slowly) point load on the walls. i'm struggling a bit with the compression in the walls and the moment in the pit base as it accepts the point load and reacts as a distributed load. there will also be a slight briging where the rail pad described above meets the pit wall (over the backfill of the pit wall).
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
inferior built shed - want to shore up huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:33 PM
deflection improvement for the existing shed huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:52 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:06 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多