几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 11:16 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 loading behind retaining wall due to existing commercial bui

loading behind retaining wall due to existing commercial bui
i am in the process in designing a retaining wall. currently, there is a one-story commercial building behind this wall.
is there a standard distance, which if the commercial building is a certain distance away, one can neglect the loading from the existing commercial building on the retaining wall?
appreciate your help.
i'd add two foot of soil as a simulated surcharge no matter how far away the building is. if it's close, you'll get the load from the building. if it's far enough away to not get a surcharge, then there's a chance someone will drive a vehicle in the gap.
to recast your question slightly, you want to ensure that the pressure bulbs of the building and the retaining wall don't overlap. for that you'd need to estimate the width of the building's footings. for the case of shallow footings, the bulb of influence extends to about two-to-five times the width of the footing deep (less for square footing, more for continuous footing) and about two times the width wide.
for a very rough estimate: draw a 1:1 (45 degree) line from bottom of footing closest to your retaining wall and see if it comes close to your retaining wall.
a disclaimer: i'm just a student at the moment, so my experience is limited to textbook examples.
i agree with the last 2 posts.
if vehicles could drive at the top then allow at least 100psf forvehicle loads.
if the retaining wall is above the45 degree 'line of influence' from the adjacent footings then it is accepted that it will not recieve significant surcharge loads from the building.

for an interesting discussion on retaining wall surcharge pressure, see
sorry, i posted the wrong load case. i've reposted the correct case together with my derivation for "the distance to surcharge for no effect on a cantilever." for your case, you'd have to substitute an equivalent surcharge height for your footing bearing pressure.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
in enercalc masonry wall design, what is parapet heigh huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:17 PM
foundation wall 40 feet below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:38 PM
existing wall footing modification huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:01 AM
existing masonry wall and sliding foundation huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:55 AM
cantilever retaining wall or no huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:39 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:35 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多