几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 11:05 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 load duration

load duration
i often see 1.33 load duration for masonry. what type of duration would this apply to?
can a 1.6 wind load duration also apply to steel and masonry as it does to wood?
thank you!
the 1.6 factor, and all the cd factors in the nds, apply to wood due to its ability to withstand short term loads better than long term loads. you would not use 1.6 for any other material.
the 1.33 (1/3 stress increase) factor has traditionally been used for various materials other than wood. however, the new ibc building code does not permit this factor unless you have two or more "transient" loads applied....and it doesn't define what a transient load is so there is debate there about when to use it.
aci 530 2.1.2.3 does allow a one-third increase.
mbones
actually, i always thought that load duration was most commonly a consideration for design of wood
current boca also does not allow 1.33 increase for seismic loading conditions unless using load factor design.
i have stopped using the increased allowable stresses as that will be the standard in the near future here.
i agree with stress02. the days of the 1.33 stress increase are numbered.
aci 530 does allow the 1/3 stress increase, but the increase is only applicable to the load combinations used in aci 530. the only way you would be using these load combinations is if the "legally adopted building code does not provide load combinations" (aci 530, 2.1.2.1).
if you are using the ibc, then you will not be using the aci 530 load combinations. the ibc's ban of the 1/3 increase will govern.
anyone disagree?

additionally, some states (florida) prohibit the material strength increase.
can someone comment on the 1.4 increase allowed for wood diaphrams and plywood sheathed shearwalls (ibc 2000 code)?
does the increase only apply to wind, or can that also apply to seismic?
see:
thats a good site for info. thanks.
when i follow the ibc, i have been using the basic load combinations "asd". from those equations, i mult. the seismic force by .7 and compare to wind.
specifically, using plywood shearwalls with 2x studs, a bit of confusion, to me, lies in section 2306.4.1 "the allowable shear cpacities.... in accordance with table 2306.4.1 these capacities are permitted to be increased 40 percent for wind design."
i am wondering if others have taken an increase in table 2306.4.1 when using seismic forces? or just for when wind is governing the design? does apa comment on these increases when using asd?
tia
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
load distribution to three supports due to concentrated load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:04 AM
load combination questionpoll huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 11:01 AM
live load reduction two way slabs huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:51 AM
is ceiling part of the roof system load duration factor 9wo huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 09:27 PM
effects of a load on sog and below grade huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 09:45 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:24 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多