几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-10, 10:55 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 live loads for decks and balconies

live loads for decks and balconies
after all the confusion about definition of "deck" versus "balcony" that endured for years under the ubc codes, the ibc supposedly cleared this up. this relates to residential and multi-family construction.
looking at 2003 ibc table 1607.1 (2000 ibc is similar),an exterior balcony gets a live load of 100 psf, with the exception of one or two-family residences only, not exceeding 100 sq. ft., you may use a live load of 60 psf.
i would think the opposite would make sense: a smaller balcony would have more of a chance to be crowded with people. therefore, why isn't the live load 100 psf for 100 sq. ft or less, and 60 psf for greater than 100 sq.ft.?
now, to make matters more confusing, read the definition of "deck" versus "balcony" - it states that "deck" is supported on at least 2 opposing sides, i.e., it is not a cantilever affair. now the since the code seems to consider this more "fail-safe", it allows live load same as occupancy served (40 psf for residential/multifamily). now isn't 40 psf unconservative? i would think it should be at least 60 psf, especially for a small deck. you could easily have a party with many people on that deck. just because it isn't cantilevered, why allow the individual joists or edge beam more of a chance to fail?
to put things in perspective, we did a load study (sort of like cramming into a vw). assuming everyone told the truth about their weight, it came to about 73 psf.
thanks for the insight. to put things to another perspective, consider a balcony that is 100 sf (say 5 ft by 20 ft). assuming an average weight of 150 pounds per person, 100 psf is equivalent to about 66 people and 60 psf is equivalent to 40 people on this balcony.
i have a balcony (actually a deck) that is more than 100 sf in my home built in 1975. this is probably designed for 40 psf. i wouldn't feel comfortable having more than 20 people...
66 people in 100 sf means one person occupies 1.5 square feet (which is pretty small even for someone who is only 150 pounds).
engineering judgement. i wouldn't design a balcony or canopy for 40 or even 60 psf. i would definitely go with 100 psf.
edit for above post. canopy = deck.
basically, any place where people congregate (lobby, balcony, etc.) i design for 100 psf.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
live load means how many people huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-10 10:49 AM
deck vs. balcony live loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:36 PM
1988 standard bldg code balcony loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:48 PM
1960s sbc live load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:44 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:41 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多