几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 07:01 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 icc existing building code iebc 2009

icc existing building code iebc 2009
i am inspecting an existing 40 foot high brick building that is 85 years old on the verge of collapse. vertical cracks i found are 2 inches wide. njdca has its own rehab code however if during construction unsound or deficient elements are uncovered i must then structurally comply ibc 2006. construction is now about 70% done. for these repairs can i use the 2009 iebc that is now available. see the link below for its description. any tips will be greatly appreciated. thanks in advance.
it depends i think on the will of the acting authority; get them in writing if using 2009 where less conservative. it uses to happen that the one that gives the warrant is or unauthorized to do so, or simply nonaccountable when a problem arises.
it is usually a couple/few years after a code is revised before most jurisdications have adopted them. i doubt 2009 iebc has been adopted many places yet.
bagman
take a look at the link below for the asce41-06 code. on page one it indicates that approval by ansi means that it can be referenced with no amendment by local codes required. iebc 2003, iebc 2006 and now 2009 is available. i think that the building offical would accept it in lieu of following ibc 2006 for a building that is 85 years old.
2 page link below for all state adopted icc codes.
if the building is, or qualifies for, a historic structure the iebc will help your client out. the iebc is very leniant for historic buildings. the 2009 iebc is very differant from past versions, the 09 code completely redefines "dangerous" and is way liberal. it allows you to repair damaged areas with "materials and workmanship which existed prior to the damage". i don't like the changes but they are what they are.
alpineengineer
as i read section 304.2.1 under repairs and evaluation the building must first be compliant for wind load and 75% of the seismic load. you are correct about "pre-damage state". the old building i am inspecting is on the verge of collapse. how was "dangerous" defined in iebc 2006. thanks.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
icc code article cause for concern huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 07:00 PM
glazing in non-windbourne debris areas huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 02:42 PM
existing building analysis concrete flat plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 08:52 AM
ada, osha and code violations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:09 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 04:18 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多