几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 06:20 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 i am isaac- 2 years in teh fieald o

i am isaac- 2 years in teh fieald o
i am isaac- 2 years in teh fieald of design but i have been designing much of my columnsand bases without taking into consideration the moments from the beams or columns or wind to these components. i would like help on how to easily carry these loads into the columns and bases. how do you think this could have affected my previous designs ? i use mainly bristish standards for my work
thanks.
you need to back check all your old designs including the forces you have ommitted. some may be ok, some overstressed ( but still ok) and some (hopefully not many) grossly overstressed and dangerous. if the latter then under your duty of care you will have to inform the owners of the structures accordingly and you will in all probability be held financially responsible for the costs of remedial repairs etc.
however, in those circumstances you must take legal advice and advice from your professional indemnity insurers before committing yourself in writing. your pi insurers may prefer to engage another structural engineer to see if he can prove your designs rather than paying out for repairs.
all credit to you for admitting your mistake and asking the question - may people would just keep quiet and moved on.
if your design analyses were based on fixed bases at your columns, you indeed have a problem. the fixed base must be assumed rigidly attached to the foundation and there will be compression in the base plate on one side of the column and tension in the anchor bolts on the other side. in addition, there would be lateral shear through the bolts as well.
if you assumed the bases to be pinned, and there were x braces or other braces attached to the column, you don't have the moments at the column bases, but you still have lateral shear and/or tension in the bolts.
if the columns are simply supporting gravity loads, you probably don't have a serious problem.
the british standards most likely have design provisions for anchor bolts in tension plus shear as well as some procedures for base plate stress calculations.
finally, i agree with mikethebike in that you need to return to the designs and ensure public safety/welfare.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
hourly wind pressure for 110 years for deflection huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 05:10 PM
durability huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:58 PM
60 years old steel building in aggresive environmen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:54 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:08 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多