几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 05:13 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 how accurate to be with dead loads

how accurate to be with dead loads?
verbage in ibc code says we must consider everything when calculating dead loads. how accurate must we get? is it ok to say:
beams: 5psf
purlins: 2psf
deck: 1psf
sprinkler: 5psf
other collateral: 5psf
total: 18psf
is this too simplified?
no. that looks pretty close to the way i do it. if this is a roof, don't forget insulation and roofing (particularly if it is a ballasted roof). otherwise, i probably would round up to 20 psf and be on my way.
beams and purlins about 3 each and deck 2 and sprinklers 3. roofing as it shakes out and mecs (mechanical, electrical, ceiling and sprinklers(already included)) varies from 5 to 15
all adjusted as reqd... the beam and sprinkler load you use may be on the upper end.
dik
when i do house design i do 15 psf dl for all floor, deck and roof (just to safe me time). then if we put gypcrete or veneer, i just add it to the dl. or sometimes for the roof they want to use tile roof, then i just add the load on the top of 15psf i already have. so my minimum dl is 15.
thank you everyone...this helps much.
if you have wind uplift, then you should remove the sprinkler and collateral loads from the resisting dead loads.
also i was taught that the sprinklers are fixed to every 2nd purlin therefore you would have twice the load on each purlin as a maximum downward load. this would obviously even out for the beams.
csd72... unless you have a real massive sprinkler system, you'd be hard pressed to have a load of 3 psf...
dik
do an accurate summing of a typical project or two. then your estimated psf rules will have a basis in fact to compare to.
i carry the sig. figs to the tenths for each item. then i add 5 to 10% of the total (minimum around 5 psf) as miscellaneous dead load to round it to some nice even number.
good advice y'all...from georgia
be careful with the dead loads in asce 7. i have found some of them (e.g. cmu walls) to not be conservative.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
fea on conrete slab - use real loads or factored loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 11:24 AM
asce 7-98 allowable stress increase huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:18 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM
applicable dead loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:33 PM
ad load factor in asd huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:22 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:17 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多