几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 04:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 holes in concrete slabs

holes in concrete slabs
i believe this has been kind of posted before but i would like to ask a question to expand the topic. what type of conservative analysis would you do with a 6'-0" diameter hole in the top of a box culvert that had an 8'-0" span? the hole was present due to a precast manhole sitting on top of the culvert. the problem stemmed from having to apply a live load and obvious dead load of the manhole. i believe that the analysis that was done was too conservative and therefore penalized the design by complicating the process. the analysis in a nutshell was to support 1/2 of the load by a beam that was spanning approx. 8' and provide bars for cracking. would appreciate any type of assistance.
if i understand you correctly, i would have done nearly the same thing. my possible exception would to use two beams either side of the 6' diameter hole spanning the 8' length. unless the hole in the top slab was somewhere near an end wall. in which case, pending how close the end of the inlet was to the endwall, i would assume part of the load to carry to each of the walls and a beam. the beam, i would try to keep within the thickness of the top slab.
i have seen this done many times and have done it myself once or twice. my reasoning for using the additional beams is fairly simple: a simplified analysis here can produce a satisfactory result with the addtional redundancy. steel is cheap, especially in light of a long culvert where concrete and excavation are far more costly. and now, without some rigorous analysis you have a design you won't be digging up later on.
qshake,
i probably should have been more specific, but i did look at 1/2 the load on 2 beams, one on either side of the hole. i guess i was wondering if the 1/2 load to each side of the "beam" was too conservative. thanks for the reply.
i think its conservative, but unless you do a more sophisticated analysis (finite elements) you really don't have any other choice.
i would think that the primary effect of such a large hole on a "slab" (or what's left of it) is a shear effect. i would be concerned that the slab around the hole, or the beams you provide, would mitigate the high shears that would build up, especially where the edge of the opening gets close to the supporting walls holding up the slab.
make sure that the thickness of the slab can handle the shear. how you distribute the shear around the hole is what's difficult. i'm not sure, without seeing the layout, how the shear would flow. with beams around four sides of a circle, you probably have it covered.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
concrete sampling guidlines huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete roof slab load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:34 PM
concrete mix= reinfocing for exterior composit deck huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 12:19 PM
concrete corrosion in partial saturated condition huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 11:54 AM
chapter 4 preliminary design properties of concrete huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:30 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多