几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 04:24 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 high moment on base pl, anchor bolts

high moment on base pl, anchor bolts
i have a base plate on a 54" sq pedestal with (2) 2-1/4 diameter x 27" anchor bolts on each of the four sides. there is a huge moment which puts the m/p eccentricity about 7 feet away from the center of the base plate. assuming the base plate is thick enough that the failure is pullout or yield of anchor bolts, how do i calculate the compression stress block in the concrete pedestal? thanks.
the procedure is pretty long to explain. go to aisc's website and download design guide 1 (column base plates). it will have the required procedure you are looking for. also, blodgett's design of welded structures has some discussion on it in section 3.3.
blodgett's design of welded structures has a solution for "base plate for column loaded with moment" under column related design. try the basic method (if uplift).
blodgett's long solution involves the solution of a cubic equation which is ok if you have mathcad or mathematica (or trial and error.) the basic method is good if you have a w shape with moment about the x-axis but for y-axis i would probably solve the general equation.
a few years ago, i incidentally encountered some calculation inconsistency using this aisc design guide. the test is very simple, but the output is quite surprising.
repeat example 16 on page 23 (base plate with large eccentricity), simply change the mu from 700 kip.in to 480 kip.in. the bending moment is reduced, but the base plate should be still part in tension, part in compression (large eccentricity) because: e = mu/pu = 5.45in > n/6 (=2.33in)
then we have afff"> = 4.04in and tfff"> = - 0.16 kip (compression)!
this is contradictory since tfff"> must be in tension with the loading.
where, afff"> = depth of compression zone; tfff"> = tension of bolts on the 鈥渢ension鈥?side.
some one told me that they found the calculation 鈥渇alling apart鈥?as well. this phenomenon was verified with different inputs. the question is still outstanding up to now.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
cantilever steel beam at column huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:40 PM
beams shear splices vs. moment splices huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:13 PM
base plate design ignores corners of base plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:24 PM
aisc 13th ed. and cjp dw moment connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:27 AM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:32 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多