几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 03:32 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 guy wire tension and shear

guy wire tension and shear
i'm having a discussion with other people at my company on how much load a continuous wire rope can hold.
example:
a continuous wire rope is threaded thru a pulley attached to a pole. they are attached at the ground at the same point. for a load of, say 4000#, each leg takes 2000#. the rated breaking strength of the wire rope is 4000#.
question: since each leg is taking one-half of the load, can the 4000# load be increased to 8000#. is the tension at the point of contact with the top of the pulley 4000# or 8000#, thereby exceeding the rated breaking stength.
also, will the shear at this point be 4000# or 8000#.
thank you for your help.
check out our whitepaper library.
if the rated strength of the rope is 4000#, call it that. trying to change the rated strength due to geometry is too confusing. what you could say, with being confusing imho, is that 4000# rope in this geometry means that the allowable load (applied at such-and-such a point) is 8,000 lbs (or whatever), and the applied load is y lbs ...
i think the tension in ths cable is 4000# throughout the length of the cable. at the top, by the pulley block, one 4,000 lbs is reacting the other, rather than doubling the load in the cable. same for the shear load.
and be careful about using the word shear when talking about a cable--a cable cannot take any shear, but only tension.
the shear in the "pole" (again, this is a poor choice of word--if it is a horizontal
thank you for your comments. just to clarify a couple of things. the pole is a vertical utility pole. it is guided at the top to stabilize the pole. i'm not saying to increase the rated breaking strength, but to increase the load. the guy is actually at a 45 degree angle, however, i was trying to be less confusing so i didn't mention it.
you could, for very simple strcutures, apply an increased external load (in the direction of the service load) and show that this load is marginally acceptable (ideally ms = 0.00), once you'd considered all the possible failure modes. then the margin for the structure under the service load is calculated from the applied loads.
but caution, some failures are not linear with applied load.
i'd prefer to apply the load required, and calculate mss accordingly ... seems more direct and takes no longer to do.
assuming no friction in the pulley, each leg will take 1/2 the total load if guys are symetrical and in line load will be 1.41 times the horizontal (or vertical) load. the load in the pulley axial (which will tranfer to the pole) will be twice the pull in either cable. cable will act in tension only, pulley will induce shear, bending and pullout at the connection. rated breaking strength does not change with load conditions, only applied load
thank you dcr1. you are consistent with myment, however, i need something in writing to prove it to the others. do have something. i've checked statics books, mechanics of materials and other civil books. nothing has any thing that shows what we are saying for the point of the connection. any help will be appriciated.
the application where multiple part lines (usually on cranes) are used to pick up loads that exceed the cable strength is very similar to your situation, and is well documented. download "us steel wire rope engineering hand book" from the home page of my website (link below) and see pages 57, 58 & 59.
thank you slideruleera for the information. one more question. with the guy going through the pulley and then both parts anchored to the ground, would you call this a one or two part line?
dick44 - if you mean like this...
then i would certainly consider that situation a two-part line.
an analogy is to look at an upside-down similar situation. at steady state (no movement of the line) the load on this platform is equal to the weight supported by the pulley (not counting the weight of the "stick-person" )...

thank you.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
does flexural reinforcement count for shear friction huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 07:15 PM
development length of reinforcement in shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 06:30 PM
can i count on shear-friction capacity of the reinforcemen huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:22 PM
block shear vs. shear rupture at connections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:57 PM
beam shear huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:01 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:08 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多