几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 01:42 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 foundations on varying strata

foundations on varying strata
i have a project where the client excavated foundations to firm bearing for a house. in one corner rock (schist) was encountered over approx. 5-10% of the building footprint. is it possible to found on the two stratums and provide a movement joint at the junction. if so what issues need considered. are there any other good practical solutions.
i am also concidering breaking the stone back and providing hardcore compacted in layers (1.0m dp.) with a raft over the whole house but this might be over kill??

what is the depth to rock on the rest of the site?
i have asked for the contractor to dig a trial pit at the opposite side of the house, if its less than 3m to rock i will get them to found on the rock with trenchfill, i suppose i am wondering about the options if this isn't the case.
vinny7
well graded compacted hardcore could be used directly on top of the rock, aprox 250mm (10 inches) thick. standard founds would be built off the hardcore and no raft would be needed. the hardcore acts as a cushion over the rock when the building on the good bearing material begins to settle.
i received this advise on a number of occasions from geotechnical engineers.
would be worth getting a geotechs opinion as there are construction costs to consider.
finnb,
i was also concidering this option but was loking for some experiance of similar situations. i would have though it would be better to have a deeper cushion of hardcore though?
vinny7
try and estimate what the settle will be for the building on the firm bearing material. the design is for a house so the building may not be that heavy. once you know the settlement it would be easily to estimate the differential settlement and then allowance could be made for the compaction of the hardcore.
on some projects i have been on 250mm of hardcore has been used to cushion rock under 6 storey concrete buildings. settlements were small on these projects (4-5mm in bolder clay/glacial tills). when you have a feel for the settlement the right decision should be easy to make.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
eccentrically loaded monolithic foundations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 08:19 PM
design of foundations for dynamic loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:39 PM
design build pemb foundations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
analyzing column strength with varying x-sections huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:42 AM
alternatives of oilsand in tank ring wall foundations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:12 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:00 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多