几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-09, 01:06 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 footing pedestal design in seismic zones 2,3 4

footing pedestal design in seismic zones 2,3 &4
per ubc 1922.10.3, structural plain concrete members are not permitted in seismic zones 2, 3 & 4.
ubc 1921.4.1 refers to "frame members". is this refering to moment frame members only or does it include members of a braced frame structure?
chapter 21 of aci seems to only refer to moment frames.
i am designing a footing pedestal for a steel column of a braced frame structure and i want to be sure i follow the correct design procedure. do i have to use a minimum reinforcement ratio of 0.01? (per ubc 1921.4.3 and aci 21.4.3.1)
check out our whitepaper library.
i would suggest using at least the minimum reinforcing ratio since even if you have some sort of bracing in the framed structure that reduces or even eliminates bending moments in the bases of the steel columns, due to free elastic length of the pedestrals some bending moments will appear there.
in some structures we have designed in europe that are consisting of a braced steel frame resting on pedestrals
(2 - 3 feet) and combined footings we designed the pedestrals as concrete columns altough codes suggested using minimum reinforcement or no reinforcement at all. the result (after capacity design) was that the reinforcement required as well as the confining reinforcement greatly exceeded the minimum values.
if the analysis shows that there are negligible moments is the bases of the pedestrals, minimum reinforcement is probably ok otherwise i would suggest treating them as rc columns...
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
footing is too small for residential addition1 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-09 01:04 PM
design of continuous or strip footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:37 PM
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
contract issues - structural steel connection design in the huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 01:40 PM
【转帖】asme美国机械工程师标准目录2 huangyhg American standards 5 2009-04-26 02:38 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:30 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多