几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 10:19 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 end returns footing design

end returns & footing design
are end returns only necessary for temp/shrink reinforcement in foundation design? if you have full development length for your flexural steel from the column face, there is no need to hook the bars right? also, can you use the (as req'd/as provided) reduction factor on the development length for flexural steel?
thanks in advance,
lee

by "end returns", if you mean hooks, then you don't typically need them at all in a footing.
anytime you can develop a bar on both sides of the critical plane of failure, then hooks are not required.
if full yield stress does not need to be developed for some reason, you can use the reduction factor.
daveatkins
with all that daveatkins noted i would only provide that in moderate to high seismic categories it is wise to use footing bars with 180 degree hooks.
regards,
qshake
eng-tips forums:real solutions for real problems really quick.
thanks, qshake. i am not in a seismic area.
daveatkins
i guess i'm having trouble with the wording of aci 318-02 7.12.2.3
"at all sections where required, reinforcement for shrinkage and temperature stresses shall develop the specified yield strength fy in tension in accordance with chapter 12."
where are the required sections? do i need to have the 180 degree hooks in order to develop fy to the ends of the pad?
highest stresses due to shrinkage and temperature do not tend to be near the free ends of a concrete pad where expansion or contraction can easily take place. the higher stresses tend to be nearer the middle of the pad or slab where you have much more restraining effects due to the size and weight of the rest of the surrounding slab. typically the reinforcement near the middle has enough concrete along its length to be developed. since reinforcement then is not really needed near the edge, say in the two or three feet of pad nearest the egde, you don't really need to develop the bar just for t&s. that's based on my engineering judgment and not hard numbers of calculations, but it seems to make sense to me.
if you have external loads requiring the development of a bar near the end, that is another matter.
perfect! thanks gents!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
抛砖引玉 yang686526 ObjectARX(VB.NET/C#) 0 2009-04-21 02:07 PM
【转帖】[原创]曲线打断于交点 yang686526 ObjectARX(VB.NET/C#) 0 2009-04-20 03:19 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:20 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多