几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 06:28 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 determining snow drift load in 1984

determining snow drift load in 1984
what was the predominant code used to determine snow drift in the '80's
the old nys code only says to include drift but not how to calculate it.
thanks

a familiar problem. my career didn't start until the 90's, but most of my time has been spent with the non-ibc based nys code. each of the different firms that i worked with using the old code calculated snow drift a different way.
the following way was the predominant way we calculated snow drift: because the code gave roof snow, we divided roof snow by .7 to get a ground snow load to be consistent with asce 7 and ansi a58. then we would take this derived ground snow load an plug it into the equations for drift height and snow density. there were many other engineers who did not take the roof snow load and divide by .7 to get a ground snow load. many used the roof snow load in the equations for snow density and drift height. i think that dividing the roof snow of the old code by .7 was the correct approach, because that's what the state did when they converted to the ibc. the drift loads were often huge because of how conservative the ny snow loads are.
before the u. s. codes starting giving procedures for drifted snow loads, engineers were essentially on their on. i have seen engineers ignore it or take a wild guess at it. we regularly refered to the canadian code which had provisions. if i recall the canadian provisions were pretty close to what we still use today.
most western states used ubc, eastern boca and southern, sbc, with others the nbc. wisconsin (from 1975 on) required a simple formula for snow drifting, which just last year switched over to ibc.
i hope this helps!
thanks for your input.
it seems the original engineer ignored the snow drift...
i'm not surpised by that. i have frequently found that snow drift was ignored in older buildings in ny, but this is not always the case. i am currently working on a building from 1980 that did unclude snow drift. good luck.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
deck with snow and live loads 9at the same time0 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 04:37 PM
asce7-05 projection snow drift question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:28 PM
asce valley drift load accumulations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:24 PM
a question regarding usa 1975 snow load cases huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:09 AM
100 or 100 = 25 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:27 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:17 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多