几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 06:03 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 design wind loads on open structures

design wind loads on open structures
first of all, i am venturing to guess that you are not a structural engineer. if your not an engieer, i suggest you consult w/ one because you are dealing with a subject many structural engineers have trouble with. secondly, if you are a structural engineer, you must only have a portion of chapter 6 "wind loads" from asce 7-98. there is a method to determine wind loading on an open structure. use eqns. 6-15 along w/ 6-13 and disregard internal pressure. distribution of the wind pressure to the members is up to your engineering judgement.
good luck.
cab30:
a very good source of information is the asce publication "wind loads and anchor bolt design for petrochemical facilities". it has good discussions and design examples for open framed structures.
best regards
this is in response to stlblueram's comments: the asce 7-98 equation is 6-20, not 6-15. 6-20 refers you to tables 6-9 through 6-12 (it should say 6-9 through 6-13) for force coefficient cf. the only one of these tables that actually applies to a building is table 6-9, which is for monoslope roofs. so if you have an open building, and it's not a monoslope roof, there are no provisions in asce 7 to cover it!
p.s. i am a structural engineer. if stlblueram sees this, i'd appreciate a response.
spats,
i stand corrected, equation 6-20 is the more relevant equation in this case. i should have gone to the code instead of citing references contained in my spreadsheet.
by the way, cab30 refers to his/her's structure as an "other open structure", not an "open building", as a result i would assume that what he/she is talking about is a structure w/o a roof. if cab30's structure is w/o a roof, it is acceptable practice to treat this structure as a trussed tower and asce-7 98 gives a method to determine design wind pressure on such a structure.
p.s.: i prefer to use eqn. 6-15 w/ cf defined per table 6-13, qz defined per section 6.5.13, and gcpi defined per table 6.7.... just personal preference. have a nice day.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
design build huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-08 05:13 PM
balcony guardrail wind huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:11 PM
asce figure 6-10 wind loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:22 PM
asce 7-98 wind load huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:20 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:42 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多