几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-08, 09:48 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 code question

code question
the governing code is boca 96 and i've been asked by a building official about highrises. he said he read somewhere that "all (seismic) connections in a high rise building must be fully restrained", and asked me if thats correct.
i dont recall reading that in any code, and i thought connection design was up to the engineer, not the buliding code.
any thoughts or insights on this? maybe someone else has read something similar?
also, what qualifies as "high rise"? anything over 240 feet?
perhaps the b.o. is thinking of aisc seismic provisions section 7.2 which requires slip-critical joints for the seismic system. or aisc specifications section j.11 which requires pretenstioned bolts for buildings taller than the prescribed heights.
the word "restrained" in code lingo is usually focused on fire resistance (see the underwriter's labs book). restrained beams are those which, as they have a portion of them heated, are restrained longitudinally against thermal expansion.
some work has been published recently that argues that most all beams in buildings can be considered restrained as the floor deck is not all heated simultaneously and restraint is provided by it to the beams.
the boca national building code, 1996 edition, section 403.1 defines high-rise structures as "...all buildings having occupied floors more than 75 feet (22860 mm) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access." varies exceptions include airport traffic control towers, open parking structures and stadiums to name a few.
i also see nothing in this book (boca) that relates to a "restrained" seismic connection and as you suggested would leave that up to the designing engineer.
brian k. willis, pe
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
british columbia building code 2006 question huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:18 PM
ada, osha and code violations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 10:09 AM
【转帖】question about detect correct code-page yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-07 12:09 PM
【转帖】nls error yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 06:34 PM
【转帖】newbie question9s0 code compiles, but cannot link yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 06:32 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:09 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多