几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:49 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 circular walls with earth fill inside

circular walls with earth fill inside
let's say the contents of the steel tank it is cohesionless sand. conservatively you can use then at rest earth pressure (if the radius is big enough). otherwise some silo effect happens, and it depends on the radius and material to establish a push law.
once you get the pressure law for thin shell normally a membrane would be assumed for hoop tension, and you can analyze it in fem. for such thin shells either you let the bottom of the sheel slip or you will have plastifications/bucklings at the foundation insert. you see to let slip something that does not weighs much to contain something that does is almost impossible task, since the sheet risks to be lifted by bottom spill. so some degree of indeterminacy at the bottom is likely to happen, but better indeterminacy than ruin.
thinking the thin sheet (even corrugated) shells taking by themselves cantilever moment i see anomalous, and maybe even as insets between standing column cantilevers.
with a circular tank the hoop stress is capable of taking the earth pressure for any diameter, as large as you want, so i don't see why you shouldn't count on it.
what changes with the type (cohesion) of filling is only how high the pressure is to be taken when calculating the hoop stress. if you consider the filling as a fluid you are of course on the safe side.
bending stresses at wall to bottom attachment are normally not accounted for for steel tanks.
moreover no fem is required for such tanks: in the site below, under vessels->api std.650 you find a sheet for calculating wall thicknesses of fluid containing circular steel tanks.
prex
i agree with prex. in looking at flatness, based on normal applications, i don't see how you could have a diameter large enough to discard the restraining hoop tension. moreover this is little more than work from mechanics of materials perhaps supplemented with roark's formulas for stress and strain. or the spreadsheets noted by prex.
i would, for overall stability, look at the tank similarly to that used with retaining walls. but even then the height of the tank would have to exceed that of the diameter by quite a bit.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
buttress wall relative rigidity huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:57 PM
below grade masonry walls huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:22 PM
【转帖】how to finding wheter a region is inside another region yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 02:37 PM
【转帖】finding whether a given point is inside a polyline yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-05 10:58 AM
【转帖】circular runou yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:55 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:07 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多