几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 05:02 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 bridge abutment footing

bridge abutment footing
i have point load maximum of 21.0 k at each wheel (42 k axle load) do i have to design the footing assuming all the load acts directly on the footing or i can assume the load spreads along more of the footing area through the medium of the abutment. i was concerned about punching shear at the footing.
in other words, should i design the footing assuming all the 21.0 k acts at a single point on the footing?
check out our whitepaper library.
no, you shouldn't design the footing assuming a single point load.
but the answer of how to distribute the load to the foundation gets a little murky from there. some points to consider are:
1. does the endbent/abutment have a concrete diaphragm encasing the longitudinal girders? if yes, the distribution may follow more along the lines of a 2:1 through the diaphragm, though aashto does have distribution formulas.
2. if there is no diaphragm encasing the girders, then the wheel load(s) is positioned on or between the girders where it is transferred to the supporting girders by simple beam distribution. the reactions of the girders now become point loads acting on the footing or abutment beam.
i hope this helps.
regards,
qshake
eng-tips forums:real solutions for real problems really quick.

i have 4' wide voided slabs basically forming the bridge. so i can basically develop the point loads in a 4' wide area? so instead of using 21.0 k directly, i can assume it be distributed along a 4'-0" wide length. ie 21k/4 = 5.25 k on the footing.
am i right in that assumption?
thanks
that's 21k/4' or 5.25k/ft on the footing, not including the length of the bearing.
if there is a shearing mechanism between the girders, a shear key or post-tensioning bar (assuming you have adjacent box beams or deck beams for your bridge) you could potentially get distribution across the joint. you have to check aashto.

regards,
qshake
eng-tips forums:real solutions for real problems really quick.

qshake, thanks for the response.
i do have shearing mechanisms between the adjacent box beams.
however, to be conservative, i will assume the load is 5.25k/ft across the whole footing.
how tall is the abutment stem? unless very short, you'll get a fair amount of distribution along the length of the abutment, likely approaching uniformity.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
bridge abutment design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 05:02 PM
basic masonry bridge building in developing countries huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:39 PM
arema rating steel bridge load combinations huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:50 PM
anchor for concrete footing huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:56 AM
aashto bridge design huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:20 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:50 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多