huangyhg

bolt failure problems
i work at a pulp mill in saskatchewan canada and we have been struggling with downtime due to bolt failures.
case study
the bolts being used are gr 8, 5/8" x 2" lg (csh*c58-2p, unc) and we use lock nuts. (lns9c58p, unc)
(1) - the bolts secure the pans to a chain links and the conveyor is used to remove hot smelt from a recovery boiler. the bolts can be exposed to hot molten metal at the recovery boiler spout and during winter months -25 c outside temperatures at the conveyor discharge. cooling water is also sprayed on the bottom of the conveyor pans.
(2) - in the past our mtce people tried gr 12 bolts thinking it was a strength problem. the bolts failed right after they were put in service. now they leave the gr 8 bolts loose, by using a locknut and damage the threads to help prevent them from backing off. the downtime problem still exists because the nuts eventually come loose and the conveyor pans fall off.
questions:
(a) - can i change from a unc thread to try and keep the bolts from backing off?
(b) - does anyone have experience using diiferent types of nuts to ensure they will not come loose and back off?
(c) - is the idea of leaving the connection loose a good one. maybe bolt with different metallurgy would stand the expansion and contraction without failing.
any help is appreciated.
find a job or post a job opening
try using anco nuts. we use them in the tower industry. i believe they only can be put on one time and can't be backed off.
try the corrosion engineering forum. you may be experiencing liquid metal embrittlement. have you tried tack welding the nuts on low strength (a307) fasteners instead of using hight strength fasteners? if the problem is corrosion related, then higher strength bolts will in general have more problems.
matador...
i am surprised that only your bolts are failing!!!?
what is the condition of the conveyor system?? if ok, then what is the conveyor material? i suspect the conveyor is made to match the environment
liquidmetal embrittlement (maybe from the fasteners' own coating ie: cadmium, zinc, etc) is likely a factor, as noted by butelja.
chemical attack, thermal shock and wear are also "obvious" problems.
i suspect that unplated [bare] aerospace bolts (alloy a286, mp35, inconel, etc...and maybe monel... may relieve or solve this problem! your company may be benefit by replacing "cheap steel fasteners with "expensive/exotic aerospace fasteners" that would be much more durable in the brutal environment you indicated!!!! part cost vs operational down-time could be improved dramatically.
note: be cautious that the bolt alloy is compatible with the conveyor alloy... ie: not gall-prone and that dissimilar material corrosion [environmental conditions] be evaluated.
note: be cautious regarding the hole-tolerances of the conveyor system... they may be "shot"... ie: worn "sloppy-loose".... in this case even great fastener-systems may fail due to chatter/vibration!
note: suitable nuts & washers will be required in-order to match the environmental capability of the [noted] bolt alloys.
some engineering eval/testing with these various aerospace alloys ... and/or assistance from a metallurgical consultant... is advised!
regards, wil taylor
the conveyor pans are standard material. mild steel, not cast.
i contacted webster chain and they recommended a locknut called security locknut which they use on the vibrating conveyors they manufacture. the supplier is sending me a few to try.
anyone have experience with this type of locknut?
look at the metallurgical compatibility between the nut and bolt as well as thermal fatigue in the bolts. you are thermal cycling heavily and this could be a contributing factor.
have you tried using castellated nuts, with a transverse hole in the end of the bolt, and a split pin through to hold the nut just that tight?
alternatively, if you can tighten the nuts and still make your pans function correctly, the most reliable bolted joint is one with the bolt preloaded to yield. this can be achieved in the field by (a) tightening the nut as tight as you can, and then (b) turning it another 1/3rd to 1/2 a turn! (codes call this "snug tight" and "turn of nut".)
hope this helps.
russell keays
re: rhk's suggestion 4 mar:
obviously in a conveyor joint, rotational movement is required. you would need to use smaller diameter bolts and "clamp-up" bushings... to get a tightly fastened joint with rotational ability. the idea of castellated nuts/cotter-pins as an added "safety-factor" with this type joint is excellent.
note: due to the severity of environmental exposure, i still believe more durable alloys are mandatory/essential requirement here!
regards, wil taylor
if your bolt is subjected to high temperature try using a286 material as suggested by wktaylor and use high temperature thread locking compound.
you might investigate the use of huck fasteners; concentric ring type bolt with hydraulically swaged collar taking the place of the usual nut. these have been used on the rake attachments of chain conveyors on chip pile reclaimer booms at paper mills. they are good for addressing potential fatigue problems and torquing of threaded fasteners.
when you say "bolt failure" do you mean that the bolts are breaking or that the nuts are falling off?
i occasionally see applications where we have high loads and very short bolts. often we can improve bolt life by using a longer bolt and a spacer. you may not have room for that, of course.
i'm trying to remember the theory behind that--i re

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]