几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 03:13 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 beams with torsion

beams with torsion
can anyone suggest a reference for design of structural tubes for flexure and torsion?
find a job or post a job opening
aisc design guide 9 - torsional analysis of structural steel members

rc
all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
edmund burke

does that include torsion on steel tubes or is it for w shapes only?
that's the real basis of my question.

section 4.4 - goes through the torsional stress on a closed shape.
section 4.6.2 - goes through the combined stresses from torsion and other loads on a closed shape.
there are also a few design examples.
example 5.2 does what you are looking for i believe.
rc
all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.
edmund burke

thank you.
you can actually use the specification itself for this. i don't have it in front of me, but it's relatively straightforward. and as you must also check the combined torsion, flexure and shear.
brezler, lin and scalzi "design of steel structures"
contains extensive information on torsion of tubular structures.
its an old book, but quite good in my opinion.
your question is a basic strength of material problem.
chicopee-
what exactly is the purpose of your comment?
it is arrogant and not the least bit helpful. true as it may be, it seems the only purpose is to make yourself look informed at the expense of the op.
and torsion, in general, is not an easy problem. in tubular sections, it is fairly straightforward, but for almost any other shape it is quite involved.
structural engineers have the added burden of taking many other factors into account. is the section torsionally restrained? is it compact? is there additional loading perpendicular to the cross section? in both directions?
you mechanical's may be able to design a circular shaft to transfer torque and forget about it. we don't have that luxury.
chicopee, your answer demonstrates that is that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing.

most structural engineers would tend to agree with frv and try to avoid torsion if at all possible. sometimes that may not be possible so we seek a reference to help us out.
with torsion some strength of materials books dont have exactly what we need so we seek a bit more as the op is doing.
perfectly understandable.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
beams braced with a welded flat steel plate huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:12 PM
asce 7 wind torsion loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:00 PM
allowable torsion strees on steel huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:09 AM
allowable rotation for steel beam in torsion huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:03 AM
1961 laminate wood beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:44 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:48 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多