几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 03:11 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 beam web stiffeners

beam web stiffeners
hi:
i’ve got a w beam with the top flange subjected to a compressive load that’s distributed over the length of the beam, and i am checking to see if web stiffeners are needed. the ends of the beam are restrained from rotating. i’ve checked for web yielding and web crippling per 9th edition of aisc asd, and web stiffeners are not needed per these criteria.
i assumed that a check for local flange bending was not needed since my beam is compact and since the limiting width-thickness ratio is not exceeded.
1. is this assumption correct?
2. if the assumption is not correct, do i need to check for local flange bending?
3. what is the criterion for checking local flange bending?
thanks
fracball,
if the 'local flange bending' to which you refer is the transverse bending (ie the flange acting as balanced cantilevers about the top of the web), then your stated assumption is incorrect, and you do have to check for it.
whether a section is compact or not, and the matter of width/thickness ratio is directed only at the longitudinal bending stresses. (if a flange outstand is too thin, then you cannot assume that the full flange area is effective in resisting 'global' bending of the beam).
what is loading the top flange? a deck, wall, etc. please clarify. usually, local flange bending checks are unwarranted, since whatever rests on your beam directly "finds" the beam web, unless you are really loading the edges of the top flange. web stiffeners are commonly used for other reasons than your case, such as web crippling due to concentrated loads, or at support reaction points. you seem to want to use them as flange stiffeners, instead of web stiffeners...
trainguy:
the dead and live weight (approx. 1000 klbf max.) of a piece of equipment will load the top flange of the beam. the load is distributed over a beam length of about 15 feet. my beam (w24x55) is being used as a support for this equipment. the footing of this equipment is such that the load will not be entirely directed into the web. you are correct, my main concern is flange stiffening instead of web stiffening. thanks for your comments.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
beam web buckling huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:10 PM
beam strengthening huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 03:04 PM
beam bracing questions huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 02:45 PM
about web opening in s beam or w-beam huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 09:29 AM
12 x 6.5x 38 thick x 41 residential basement i-beam con huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-06 10:30 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:43 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多