几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 01:16 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 asce 7-05

asce 7-05
after one has used the subject code to calc. the base shear for wind & seismic loads and determines that wind will govern the design how should one "operationalize" the instructions in chapter 11.1.1 (p.109) and appendix c11.1.1 (p.353)?
appendix "c11.1.1 purpose" sez that even though the wind loads govern the design that the "...detailing requirements and the limitations prescribed in this section (the seismic section) are still required to be followed".
thanks for your thoughts on this issue.
find a job or post a job opening
this means that even if the wind design governs, yet you are not relieved of the seismic detailing requirements. ibc seismic detailing requirements are essentially chapter-21 of aci seismic design requirements for concrete structures.
based on which seismic design category (sdc) your structure is, you have to make sure your detailing of the
i have mentioned ibc in my previous post. but still the comment holds true.
you should also note that it is possible for wind to govern the base shear while seismic governs some individual member designs. this is obviously too cumbersome for hand calcs, but if you are using ram or something similar you should take note of what load combination is governing all
thanks for the response. i practice in the puget sound area of washington (the state) and the seismic design category is always "d".
since i am doing mostly light framed construction i believe that i am off the hook for omega multipliers on drag struts, collectors, etc. i will need to put on my thinking cap to figure out how these requirement might affect reinforced concrete retaining walls.i think that it is unfortunate that table 15.4-2 (seismic coefficients for nonbuilding structures not similar to buildings) didn't specifically identify cantilever retaining walls. i use the values for "all other steel & reinforced concrete distributed mass structures..." to calc. the seismic loads.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
asce 7-05, 7-02, 7-98 confusion huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:15 PM
asce 7-05 wind load methods 1 2 huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:14 PM
asce 7 wind torsion loads huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 01:00 PM
asce 17-96 para. 4.2.5 load combinations seiasce 7-02 com huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:54 PM
are asce 7-02 wind loads ultimate or service level huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 12:46 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 06:34 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多