几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 12:16 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 another minn bridge with problem gussets

another minn bridge with problem gussets
mn dot finds some bent gussets in another similar bridge to the i35w bridge that collapsed. i guess we can say that the inspectors are a bit more focused after that collapse.
amazing how peoples perception of safety changes after a structural collapse of a major structure.
the photos [2003 ]of the i35w bridge gussets have been released.a no brainer !!!
something isn't clear about the gusset plates where they too thin as designed/built or where they too thin at the time of failure due to additional weight imposed by later modifications.
the question we need to ask: was the bending due to some abnormal movement of the bridge or was did it occur during construction?
if you've ever worked with ironworkers things get bent all the time.
who can tell for certain if they were too thin or not? weren't the design documents 'lost'?
speaking of the design documents, what is the typical requirement for saving and storing design docs after the structure is built? aviation keeps these things forever because of maintenance requirements. what about non aviation structures?
i believe there was a report stating that the gussets were underdesigned (based on recalculation). you don't really need the original documents to determine that.
i love how they quote lawyers as if they are expert witnesses.
i heard this brodge may have been designed bu the same firm that did the i35w bridge.
in the photo referenced in the post by robertmetfff"> what would the approach to fix it if someone deemed it had to fixed pdq?
unclesyd - bolting stiffener angles is not uncommon to the retrofit of gusset plates.
prost - i believe the industry standard is 7-10 years for keeping calculations and other documentation. this bridge and the 35 bridge are well over 40 yrs old. and as i understand it, the firm was acquired by another larger firm...when that happens there is a typical house cleaning. hence i don't think it unusual to expect to find original calculations.
regards,
qshake
eng-tips forums:real solutions for real problems really quick.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
when do you know for sure huangyhg SPC质量控制 0 2009-09-05 09:06 PM
【转帖】problem reading r12 dxf files yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 10:56 PM
【转帖】problem in opening file with 2.1.0 yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 10:47 PM
【转帖】oda 1.06 vs new 1.08 and 1.09 nls problem yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-06 06:50 PM
【转帖】cannot open a dwg file in autocad - random problem yang686526 DirectDWG 0 2009-05-04 05:28 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:55 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多