几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:54 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 anchor bolts... j vs. l

anchor bolts... j vs. l ?
i've noticed in means and my cost estimating database that there are l type and j type anchor bolts? what's the difference between the two?

l-shaped anchors have one 90 degree bend at the embedded end. j-bolts have an 180 degree bend at its end.
what about expansion bolts,,, do they,,, expand???
thank you, thank you, you are a great audience. but seriously folks, other than expansion, what are the pros/cons of them? the only thing i see is the j type would be hook the rebar and maybe take more up lift, but once the conc. cures i don't see how the l type would be any different from the j type.
the difference is in the pullout failure mechanism. for that reason, the j bolt is more appealing to engineers who are faced with a small volume in order to properly anchor a bolt.
i've never understood the advantage of using these hooked anchors. why not just specify a nut at the end of the anchor and get the capacity of a shear cone?
j-bolts and l-bolts can pull out before concrete failure occurs. this is a disadvantage.
using a straight bolt with a plate on the end develops a good shear cone and high strength, provided they are placed such that the reinforcing steel intersects the stress development area.
expansion bolts are designed so that when loaded (pre-load is required for seating during installation), a sleeve or wedge device will be pushed outward against the concrete as the bolt is being pulled upward by the load. the bolts don't actually expand, the design of the bolt device just re-orients the load. works opposite the "chinese finger puzzle".
hey qshake....whereya been?? glad you're back.
check the new aci-318-03 appendix d. headed bolts are the way to go with anchor bolts. j and l bolts never actually acted the way it was assumed in design.
i have not yet seen aci-318-03 as it is not applicable to my area. but i would practice following checks before i use headed bolts.
1. shear cone as haynewp has said.
2. threaded/ welded connection between the head and the bolt, if any.
3. bearing stress directly under the head of bolt (or plate in ron's post)as this stress will probably govern the design.
providing the bond length is simpler and more easy in contrast. no?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 10:57 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多