几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 11:23 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 aluminum screen enclosure to fascia

aluminum screen enclosure to fascia
i am a structural engineer and i design screen enclosures typically for pool areas which attach to the fascia board of the home. my question regards capacity of the house truss to take the additional wind loads (up and down)from the enclosure. (a typical load is 150 lb/ft of fascia or 1350 lb at a 9' spacing along the fascia up or down.)
1. where the screen enclosure attaches to the end of a truss, is there a simple way to calculate the load capacity of the truss and the design load of the truss to find the "excess capacity" in order to approve this additional load? for this project the truss engineering drawings cannot be found. (if they were found, would this information be there?)does the size of the overhang raise additional bending concerns for the top chord of the truss?
2.of course the truss connection must be checked in uplift loads. i found the capacity for toe-nailed connections. is there any information on mechanical connections?
3. in some situations, there is "gable end framing" (the fascia board is parallel to the truss and there are "ladders" connecting the truss to the fascia board). is there a calculation or somewhere to find detailed drawings of how this is constructed to estimate the capacity of this type of framing?
thank you for any information provided.
i assume that the trusses use the metal connector side plates.
in this area, the competition for factory fabricated trusses is so high that there is little excess capacity built in.
the loading you descibe is sufficient to possibly overstress the members or the plates. the truss plate institute (tpi) or the canadian equivalent (tpic) has information regarding assumptions used for analysis and the only 'correct' method is to check a truss for the new loading using their assumptions using one of the analysis programs available. the truss manufacturers have software specifically tailored for truss design; it's quite expensive and is often set up for the specific truss plate involved.
alternatively, you may want to contact an engineer that designs trusses for a fabricator and see if he can/will take on the work (truss plates, although different, are similar). i use a fellow out of winnipeg that has 20 years experience with trusses and it costs about $150 for simple trusses.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
aluminum properties huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:23 AM
aluminum grating with steel beams huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:20 AM
aluminum design reference huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:18 AM
aluminum column base plates huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 11:17 AM
6061 t6 aluminum huangyhg 产品功能分析 0 2009-09-07 08:55 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:05 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多