几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD设计 » 产品功能分析
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-07, 10:46 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 aisi and through fastened roofs1111111

aisi and through fastened roofs!!!!!!!
hi all,
section c.3.1.3 of the aisi '96 code provides numerous conditions for a roof panel to be considered through fastened. one of the requirements (#8) states that "for continuous span systems, the longest member span shall not be more than 20% greater than the shortest span.
i have found that this requirement is easily failed. take for an example a 112ft wide building. i have endwall spacings of 16', 15', 15', 20', 15', 15' and 16'. these spacings are pretty much a fixed requirement of openings in the wall.
does anyone understand the basis of this requirement? how stringent is this in terms of the ability of the screw down sheets to proveide bracing for the flanges of the girts? my judgement tells me that i can use through fastened design factors on my secondary design for this wall and not worry about discrete braces for the girts. am i mistaken in this assumption?
and, if my assumption is acceptable, how far can this requiremnt be stretched? if i have a system that passes all the other requirements but only fails this one, at what point do i have to introduce discrete braces ....30%, 40% etc? say on a 120ft wide building, endwall spacing was 10', 20', 20', 20', 20', 20' and 10'. would this require discrete braces?
thanks in adavance for any and all input.
js.
to the best of my knowledge all of the criteria listed in this section of the aisi is based on test results and the material (members)that was tested. the rule of thumb that i have heard from researchers is that you can extrapolate 10% beyond the given limitations. for example, even though the criteria calls for a maximum member depth of < 11.5", you can still use the criteria for a 12" deep cold-formed
was my post so controversial that it got removed?
anyway, the aisi spec defines a reduction factor r that is applied based on the purlin or girt conditions defined in section c3.1.3. the reduction factor is applied to the full allowable strength on the section being analyzed. this eliminates the need to do a full analysis of the unbraced lengths of the member to determine its capacity.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 03:46 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多