几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间:产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CAD/CAM/CMM » 精密机械
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 11:26 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 positional tolerances

positional tolerances
where do i find the "standard" positional tolerances used in the aerospace/aicraft industry? that is, if i want to locate a tooling detail, is there an industry-accepted minimum tolerance applicable for a specified position (e.g the hole must be 5 inches from a datum with a tolerance of +/-0.0x inch)? is there a table of common tolerances used in the aircraft industry?
there are many standards out there but it almost depends on which company you work with. it depends on the engineering drawing of the part itself. if the feature of the part is tightly controlled on the drawing or is a locating feature i've seen as small as +/- .006 positional and as great as +/- .050. there are mil standards out there for datum and control features but it kind of depends of what kind of part it is (ie sheet metal, casting, forging, etc). plus it also depends on the jig type itself (tooling feature with drill bushing, scribed tooling feature, edge locator, removable detail, etc.) can you be more specific with what feature you are trying to locate on the part?
i do not think that there are standard positional tolerances. what i know is that many standard like din have tables of tolerances that apply in the drawing when the designer doesn't define a custom tolerance.
for example in my drawing i use concentricity of dia 0.1 mm unless otherwise specified. tolerances should be functional and only should ensure that the parts and assembly will function. if the standard/general tolerance is what needed then we do not write it within the dimension otherwise always put the maximum tolerance that will still do the job.
a good advice, always try yourself to figure out what is the needed tolerance before you rely on cooked rules. this is the only way to get better understanding.
old joke - "the nice thing about standards is that there's so many to choose from."
the military is getting out of the business of maintaining standards. they're relying on commerical standards published by industry and even handing over mil specs for industry to adopt and maintain for the world to use and buy. like whiterabbit said, it depends on what company you work for. i know when i worked for lockmart most if not all joining methodology was spelled out in lac3600. but another spec that's packed with information on aerospace structures is mil hdbk 5.
best of luck
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
fully employing positional tolerancing over rectangular tole huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 10:49 AM
capability studies on positional tolerances 9rfs0 huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:12 PM
【转帖】fully employing positional tolerancing over rectangular tole yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:02 PM
【转帖】capability studies on positional tolerances 9rfs0 yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:48 PM
【转帖】calculating positional tolerance yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:43 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 02:05 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多