几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 01:44 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 use of centerlines

use of centerlines
scenario:
creating a side view of a plate with holes in it. the holes go straight through the plate. the holes are fully dimensioned in the top view.
question:
is it necessary to draw (create) centerlines for the holes in the side view?
check out our whitepaper library.
no i would not.
i only do it if the side view is a cross section then i will. what communicates the depth of the holes on the print? do you have thru on the diameter? if you are trying to dimension to the centers on the side view i would say yes. but once again to be more clear i would have made a cross section.
i personally always apply centerlines in my side views no matter if there sectioned or not. center lines help to communicate that's it's the center of the dia/hole.
plus with out thumbing through the standard looking for it. i think its a standard that all dia's/hole shown in a side view should have a center line. i know one of you brilliant people out there will correct me if i'm wrong.
solid edge v20
it depends... will the centerlines add clarity to the part definition, or will they only clutter and complicate the view? a side view of a part with a handfull of holes is much different than a side view of a plate with hundreds of holes, yet if you follow the rule that "all" holes are to have a centerline, you will quickly have an unreadable drawing, and those centerlines will prevent clear communication of the part definition.
good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor."fff"> - robert hunter

just to clarify what i said, i just show what's needed in the side view's when it comes to holes. as ewh said, if you show to much with centerlines you can clutter the drawing.
as stated above, you should always apply a center line if your showing it in your side view, section or not
solid edge v20
sdeters
no i would not.
i only do it if the side view is a cross section then i will. what communicates the depth of the holes on the print? do you have thru on the diameter? if you are trying to dimension to the centers on the side view i would say yes. but once again to be more clear i would have made a cross section.
response:
the depth of the hole is communicated in the top view, which all are thru holes. location of the holes are dimensioned also in the top view. the only dimension i have in the side view is the thickness of the plate.
cadman1964
i personally always apply centerlines in my side views no matter if there sectioned or not. center lines help to communicate that's it's the center of the dia/hole.
plus with out thumbing through the standard looking for it. i think its a standard that all dia's/hole shown in a side view should have a center line. i know one of you brilliant people out there will correct me if i'm wrong.
response:
do you know where i could find the standard?
thanks guys or gals. i appreciate you taking the time to help out a fellow engineer. i was really hoping for an definative yes or no, but "clear communication" sounds like an excellent answer, and i agree. thanks again.
i agree...only if sectioned and if needed.
to add cl on every hole in every view just adds confusion and clutter.
chris
solidworks 09, catia v5
if the top (plan) view fully delineates the holes, i see no need to stick centerlines on a side view. most cad systems won't put them in, so it is extra work to do so.
if there is no depth called out on a hole (i.e. blind hole) then the hole is assumed to be a through hole.
the word "thru" is an unnecessary habit that many of us (me included)have developed in the past and tend to carry over.
there are cases on complicated parts where the word "thru" is helpful, such as some holes in a pattern being blind and others through, but in the op's case above i don't see the need.
quote:
most cad systems won't put them in, so it is extra work to do so
solid edge will put them in once you select the automatic center line command.
maybe it's me, being as middle aged as i am. i just re
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
simultaeous requirements huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-05 12:55 PM
centerline symmetry huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:15 PM
center marks where feature is dimensioned huangyhg tec-ease(America) 0 2009-09-04 05:14 PM
【转帖】simultaeous requirements yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 09:59 PM
【转帖】center marks where feature is dimensioned yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 06:49 PM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:27 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多