几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-05, 01:14 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 systemic

systemic
in my organization there is a systemic problem that is hard to address.
senior engineers can not make drawings to the industry standards and top management don't seems to care or resolve the problem because they themselves can not read drawings properly.is the next step the legal counsel of the company besides training,or ?
i think that this problem is big enough to create serious liability to the company.we already manage to get in trouble with the regulators.

thanks.
check out our whitepaper library.
whoa there...
what is the effect of this lack of following standards? which standards are you referring to, asme or ansi? what type of product? aerospace is a big field.
i don't think there is any reason to get lawyers involved in this. there are many tests that critical aerospace components must pass before they are allowed to "fly". the biggest effect of not following industry standards is usually monetary. failing a customer audit and losing their business or producing a lot of scrap due to ambiguous drawings is usually punishment enough. if critical parts are made in which it would be very difficult to find any defects after inspection and testing due to not following standards, then maybe, just maybe, there would be reason to go to the legal department.
good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor."fff"> - robert hunter

escalating to the lawyers before all internal possibilities are exhausted will have ugly consequences for you, so unless there is immediate risk to the public, i'd try to quickly build a case that could be presented to management first. hot-button topics for management tend to include waste, competetiveness, and liability. if the workpieces must be regulation-compliant to a specified government standard but aren't, that's another facet to approach as the potential for fines and punitive actions isn't trivial in many cases.
welcome to my world, except i don't have the same safety concerns.
i've made a few posts on similar issues so you may want to take a look at those to see if there's anything of value there.
as ewh says, while there are definitely exceptions, generally poor drawings cost time & money not lives. do you have specific samples of safety being affected?
if you could give more information such as what standards you work to, what your position in the organization is, if you have separate drafters etc. then maybe folks can come up with some more targetted suggestions.
kenat,
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】systemic yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 10:37 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:19 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多