几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


 
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-04, 05:09 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 callouts for sections over z-z

callouts for sections over z-z
hello - i would like to know what is accepted practice for calling out sections over z-z - is it aa-aa or what - any info would be appreciated - thank you
yes.
take a look at asme y14.3-2003 section 1.7.3. identifying removed views.
quote:
...when the alphabet is exhausted, additional removed views shall be identified by double letters in alphabetical order, as in aa-aa, ab-ab, ac-ac, etc.
kenat,
i have never seen sections go that far.
maybe aab? just a guess..
chris
solidworks/pdmworks 08 3.1
autocad 08
good find kenat.
chris
solidworks/pdmworks 08 3.1
autocad 08
maybe aab?
after az-az would be ba-ba, all the way to zz-zz if you really needed it.
not using i,o,q,s,x,and z that's what, 20 squared or 400 sections before needing aaa,aab,etc?
i've seen some j size aircraft drawings with a ton of sections, but nothing close to using up the double letter limit.
yeh, kenat was taught well
no longer the least qualified checker.

i had at least one good teacher.

kenat,
i think that i've gotten up to around aj-aj before, but that was a rare occurance.
when the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.fff"> - thomas jefferson

hello again & thank you so much for the replies - we have had so many problems w/ our assembly drawings w/ over seas manufacturing that our v.p. has instructed us to take as many views & sections as possible - this is the very 1st time i myself have run out of letters - once again this forum has become so valuable - thank you again
wow, sorry i'm amazed.
usually managment, or similars, response is to create lots of exploded view or the like. they claim shop floor workers can't understand sections etc.
however 'take as many views & sections as possible ' still sounds odd.
i'm of the 'minimum number of views necessary to fully define the part/assembly' school.
eitherway, glad to be of assistance and good luck.
kenat,
quote:
take as many views & sections as possible
certainly sounds like a solution to a problem that it not understood.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
 


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭

相似的主题
主题 主题发起者 论坛 回复 最后发表
【转帖】use of stk for stock size callouts yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 11:05 AM
【转帖】orque callouts yang686526 American standards 0 2009-05-04 10:54 AM
【转帖】material callouts yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 08:46 PM
【转帖】asme - where to star yang686526 American standards 0 2009-04-29 07:28 PM
【转帖】appearance callouts yang686526 SolidWorks二次开发 0 2009-04-13 09:01 AM


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:28 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多