几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » GD&T standards » Standard training » tec-ease(America)
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-09-04, 04:30 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 086-56 unc or 2-56 unc

.086-56 unc or 2-56 unc
i had a previous customer that required tapped holes be called out with the decimal major diameter(.086)instead of the screw number (2). i haven't found an asme specification that supports this. does anyone know if there is such a specification?
check out our whitepaper library.
asme b1.1-1989 unified inch screw threads, uses both.
thanks for the quick response.
asme y14.6-2001, screw thread representation, in section 3.2, specifically 3.2.1.3, details how they should be called out on drawings.
numbered sizes mayfff"> be shown because of established practices. the decimal equivalent, to three decimal places, shouldfff"> be shown in parentheses.
so you can show decimal without numbers, but if showing numbers you should show decimals too.
kenat,
thanks kenat,
i attempted to look at asme y14.6 but our .pdf file is only accessible to the person/computer that downloaded it. as soon as i track down that "person" i'll look it up.
gotta love 'smart' pdf's.
it's ok and common practice to only use the number, such as 2-58.
matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
it may be common practice but the relevant asme standard does say you should add the decimal equivalent in parentheses. many people ignore that, like they ignore that it says to explicitly reference asme b1.1 or other thread form spec.
do so at your own risk and don't blame me in the unlikely event someone uses it as an excuse to make you buy a non functioning piece of ****.
there was a thread on here not so long ago where someone was confused thinking the # was the diameter in inches or something like that. to me that makes the case for following the standard and making it clear.
kenat,
i agree with kenat - it may be common practice, but that doesn't make it correct per the standard. if your company standard defines it differently, then fine. if you default to the asme standards, it is wrong.
good to know you got shoes to wear when you find the floor."fff"> - robert hunter

we all know what "should" and "may" means in the asme though.
matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
from my experience, use 2-56 unc. the machinists understand this better. if you call out the decimal equiv, inspection may question tolerances.
either way you choose that works for your company, be consistant and stay with one type.
chris
solidworks 09, catia v5
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:48 AM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多